{"id":13610376,"date":"2026-08-18T14:58:06","date_gmt":"2026-08-18T12:58:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/jetflights\/world-military-strength-compared-aircraft-ships-troops-spending-2026\/"},"modified":"2026-08-19T11:25:04","modified_gmt":"2026-08-19T09:25:04","slug":"world-military-strength-compared-aircraft-ships-troops-spending-2026","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/es\/world-military-strength-compared-aircraft-ships-troops-spending-2026\/","title":{"rendered":"The World&rsquo;s Militaries, Counted"},"content":{"rendered":"<style>.et_pb_title_container h1.entry-title { padding-top: 40px !important; }<\/style>\n\n<script>(function(){window.addEventListener(\"message\",function(e){if(e.origin!==\"https:\/\/migflug.com\")return;var d=e.data;if(!d||!d.mfgFrame||!d.id||!d.h)return;var f=document.querySelector('iframe[data-mfg=\"'+d.id+'\"]');if(f&&Math.abs(f.offsetHeight-d.h)>4){f.style.height=(d.h)+\"px\";f.setAttribute(\"height\",d.h);}},false);})();<\/script><p>In 2025 the world spent <strong>$2,887 billion<\/strong> on its armed forces. That is the highest figure SIPRI has ever recorded, the eleventh consecutive annual increase, and it works out at $352 for every person alive.<\/p><p>Below is what that money bought, counted as carefully as open sources allow: aircraft, ships, submarines, carriers and people, country by country.<\/p><p>Two warnings before the tables. First, every number here is an <em>estimate<\/em> from a named source with a stated date &mdash; they are not interchangeable, and mixing editions produces nonsense. Second, and more importantly, the definitions do more work than the numbers. A &ldquo;destroyer&rdquo; is whatever a navy decides to call a destroyer. Whether a country has 291 warships or 461 depends entirely on which rulebook you open. We have flagged those traps as we go, because they are where almost every viral military comparison falls apart.<\/p>\r\n<div style=\"background:#f5f5f5;padding:20px 22px;margin:24px 0\"><p style=\"margin:0 0 10px;font-weight:700;font-size:17px;color:#222\">Quick Facts<\/p><table style=\"width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;font-size:15px\"><tr><td style=\"padding:6px 12px 6px 0;color:#666;vertical-align:top;white-space:nowrap\"><strong>World military spending, 2025<\/strong><\/td><td style=\"padding:6px 0;color:#222\">$2,887 billion (current 2025 US$) &mdash; up 2.9% in real terms<\/td><\/tr><tr><td style=\"padding:6px 12px 6px 0;color:#666;vertical-align:top;white-space:nowrap\"><strong>World military burden<\/strong><\/td><td style=\"padding:6px 0;color:#222\">2.5% of global GDP &mdash; the highest since 2009<\/td><\/tr><tr><td style=\"padding:6px 12px 6px 0;color:#666;vertical-align:top;white-space:nowrap\"><strong>Top spender<\/strong><\/td><td style=\"padding:6px 0;color:#222\">United States, $954bn &mdash; 33% of the world total<\/td><\/tr><tr><td style=\"padding:6px 12px 6px 0;color:#666;vertical-align:top;white-space:nowrap\"><strong>Active military aircraft worldwide<\/strong><\/td><td style=\"padding:6px 0;color:#222\">52,231 across 161 nations (FlightGlobal\/Cirium, 1 Oct 2025 data)<\/td><\/tr><tr><td style=\"padding:6px 12px 6px 0;color:#666;vertical-align:top;white-space:nowrap\"><strong>Largest air fleet<\/strong><\/td><td style=\"padding:6px 0;color:#222\">United States, 13,033 aircraft &mdash; 25% of the global total<\/td><\/tr><tr><td style=\"padding:6px 12px 6px 0;color:#666;vertical-align:top;white-space:nowrap\"><strong>Fixed-wing aircraft carriers<\/strong><\/td><td style=\"padding:6px 0;color:#222\">20 hulls, operated by just six countries<\/td><\/tr><tr><td style=\"padding:6px 12px 6px 0;color:#666;vertical-align:top;white-space:nowrap\"><strong>Largest navy by hull count<\/strong><\/td><td style=\"padding:6px 0;color:#222\">China (PLAN), over 370 battle-force ships<\/td><\/tr><tr><td style=\"padding:6px 12px 6px 0;color:#666;vertical-align:top;white-space:nowrap\"><strong>Largest army<\/strong><\/td><td style=\"padding:6px 0;color:#222\">China (PLA), about 2.0 million active personnel<\/td><\/tr><tr><td style=\"padding:6px 12px 6px 0;color:#666;vertical-align:top;white-space:nowrap\"><strong>Principal sources<\/strong><\/td><td style=\"padding:6px 0;color:#222\">SIPRI (April 2026), FlightGlobal World Air Forces 2026, US CRS, US DoD, IISS, CSIS<\/td><\/tr><\/table><\/div>\r\n<h2 style=\"padding-top:22px\">Part One: The Money<\/h2><p>Spending is the cleanest of all these measures, because SIPRI has been doing it consistently since 1949 and publishes its methodology. It is also the best single predictor of everything else on this page, with a lag of about a decade.<\/p>\n<iframe class=\"mfg-embed skip-lazy\" data-no-lazy=\"1\" loading=\"eager\" data-mfg=\"spend\" src=\"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2026\/08\/military-spending-top-15-2025-sipri.html\" style=\"width:100%;border:0;display:block;margin:26px 0;overflow:hidden\" height=\"720\" scrolling=\"no\" title=\"MiGFlug data visual\"><\/iframe>\n\n<div style=\"background:#f0f4ff;border-left:4px solid #5C91FF;padding:16px 20px;margin:30px 0\"><p style=\"margin:0 0 8px;font-weight:600;color:#333\">Use these charts on your own site<\/p><p style=\"margin:0 0 10px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.6;color:#333\">Every table and chart in this article is a standalone page with its own address, so you are welcome to embed any of them &mdash; free, and with no registration. Right-click a visual and choose <em>&ldquo;Show only this frame&rdquo;<\/em> to get its URL, or take it from the source of this page. Then drop it into your own site as an iframe:<\/p><pre style=\"margin:0 0 10px;padding:12px 14px;background:#0f172a;color:#e2e8f0;font-size:12.5px;line-height:1.6;overflow-x:auto;white-space:pre-wrap;word-break:break-all\">&lt;iframe src=\"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2026\/08\/military-spending-share-2005-vs-2025-pie.html\" style=\"width:100%;border:0\" height=\"700\" scrolling=\"no\"&gt;&lt;\/iframe&gt;<\/pre><p style=\"margin:0;font-size:14px;line-height:1.6;color:#555\">Each visual reports its own height to the parent page, so it will size itself correctly if you keep <code>scrolling=\"no\"<\/code>. All we ask is a visible credit and a link back to this article. If you would like a chart built to different dimensions, or the underlying figures as a spreadsheet, get in touch.<\/p><\/div>\n\n<iframe class=\"mfg-embed skip-lazy\" data-no-lazy=\"1\" loading=\"eager\" data-mfg=\"spendbar\" src=\"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2026\/08\/who-spends-most-military-2025.html\" style=\"width:100%;border:0;display:block;margin:26px 0;overflow:hidden\" height=\"520\" scrolling=\"no\" title=\"MiGFlug data visual\"><\/iframe>\n\n<iframe class=\"mfg-embed skip-lazy\" data-no-lazy=\"1\" loading=\"eager\" data-mfg=\"piespend\" src=\"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2026\/08\/military-spending-share-2005-vs-2025-pie.html\" style=\"width:100%;border:0;display:block;margin:26px 0;overflow:hidden\" height=\"620\" scrolling=\"no\" title=\"MiGFlug data visual\"><\/iframe>\n<h2 style=\"padding-top:22px\">Burden, Not Just Bulk<\/h2><p>Absolute spending flatters large economies. Military burden &mdash; spending as a share of GDP &mdash; shows how much a country is actually straining.<\/p>\n<iframe class=\"mfg-embed skip-lazy\" data-no-lazy=\"1\" loading=\"eager\" data-mfg=\"burden\" src=\"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2026\/08\/military-burden-gdp-share-2025.html\" style=\"width:100%;border:0;display:block;margin:26px 0;overflow:hidden\" height=\"700\" scrolling=\"no\" title=\"MiGFlug data visual\"><\/iframe>\n<p>Ukraine has now spent four consecutive years with the highest military burden on earth &mdash; 40% of GDP and 63% of all government spending. Russia&rsquo;s military share of government spending reached 20% in 2025, the highest SIPRI has ever recorded for the country.<\/p>\r\n<div style=\"background:#f8f9fa;border-left:4px solid #1565c0;padding:20px 22px;margin:18px 0 24px;font-size:16px;line-height:1.7;display:flex;gap:20px;align-items:flex-start\"><div><em>&ldquo;Global military spending rose again in 2025 as states responded to another year of wars, uncertainty and geopolitical upheaval with large-scale armament drives. Given the range of current crises, as well as many states&rsquo; long-term military spending targets, this growth will probably continue through 2026 and beyond.&rdquo;<\/em><div style=\"margin-top:10px;font-size:14px;color:#555\"><strong>Xiao Liang<\/strong> &mdash; Researcher, SIPRI Military Expenditure and Arms Production Programme, April 2026<\/div><\/div><\/div>\r\n<h2 style=\"padding-top:22px\">The Long View: 1, 5, 10 and 20 Years<\/h2><p>A single year tells you very little. Trends tell you what a country has decided about the next decade.<\/p>\n<iframe class=\"mfg-embed skip-lazy\" data-no-lazy=\"1\" loading=\"eager\" data-mfg=\"trend\" src=\"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2026\/08\/military-spending-trends-1-5-10-20-years.html\" style=\"width:100%;border:0;display:block;margin:26px 0;overflow:hidden\" height=\"600\" scrolling=\"no\" title=\"MiGFlug data visual\"><\/iframe>\n\n<iframe class=\"mfg-embed skip-lazy\" data-no-lazy=\"1\" loading=\"eager\" data-mfg=\"twentyyr\" src=\"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2026\/08\/military-spending-twenty-year-growth.html\" style=\"width:100%;border:0;display:block;margin:26px 0;overflow:hidden\" height=\"480\" scrolling=\"no\" title=\"MiGFlug data visual\"><\/iframe>\n<p>That last line is the whole story of the century so far. Chinese and Russian spending have both grown roughly 350% in twenty years. American spending has grown 8.5%. The United States still spends more than the next seven countries combined, but the gap has been closing for two decades, and 2025 was the first year in some time that Washington&rsquo;s spending actually fell.<\/p>\r\n<div style=\"background:#f8f9fa;border-left:4px solid #d32f2f;padding:20px 22px;margin:18px 0 24px;font-size:16px;line-height:1.7;display:flex;gap:20px;align-items:flex-start\"><div><em>&ldquo;The decline in US military expenditure in 2025 is likely to be short-lived. Spending approved by the US Congress for 2026 has risen to over $1 trillion, a substantial increase from 2025, and could rise further to $1.5 trillion in 2027 if President Trump&rsquo;s latest budget proposal is accepted.&rdquo;<\/em><div style=\"margin-top:10px;font-size:14px;color:#555\"><strong>Nan Tian<\/strong> &mdash; Programme Director, SIPRI Military Expenditure and Arms Production Programme, April 2026<\/div><\/div><\/div>\r\n<h2 style=\"padding-top:22px\">NATO Versus Everyone<\/h2><p>Alliance arithmetic changes the picture completely. NATO&rsquo;s 32 members between them spent $1,581 billion in 2025 &mdash; 55% of all military spending on earth.<\/p>\n<iframe class=\"mfg-embed skip-lazy\" data-no-lazy=\"1\" loading=\"eager\" data-mfg=\"blocs\" src=\"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2026\/08\/nato-russia-china-military-spending-blocs-2025.html\" style=\"width:100%;border:0;display:block;margin:26px 0;overflow:hidden\" height=\"420\" scrolling=\"no\" title=\"MiGFlug data visual\"><\/iframe>\n<p>European NATO spending rose faster in 2025 than in any year since 1953. Germany passed 2% of GDP for the first time since 1990; Spain for the first time since 1994, with a 50% single-year jump. Poland now carries the heaviest burden in the alliance at 4.5%.<\/p>\r\n<div style=\"background:#f8f9fa;border-left:4px solid #1565c0;padding:20px 22px;margin:18px 0 24px;font-size:16px;line-height:1.7;display:flex;gap:20px;align-items:flex-start\"><div><em>&ldquo;In 2025 military spending by European NATO members rose faster than at any time since 1953, reflecting the ongoing pursuit of European self-reliance alongside increasing pressure from the United States to strengthen burden sharing within the alliance.&rdquo;<\/em><div style=\"margin-top:10px;font-size:14px;color:#555\"><strong>Jade Guiberteau Ricard<\/strong> &mdash; Researcher, SIPRI Military Expenditure and Arms Production Programme, April 2026<\/div><\/div><\/div>\r\n<h2 style=\"padding-top:22px\">Part Two: Airpower<\/h2><p>There are <strong>52,231<\/strong> active military aircraft in the world, spread across 161 nations. The number fell by 411 last year, mostly because the entire Syrian air force &mdash; 414 aircraft &mdash; was deleted from the count.<\/p>\r\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\" style=\"margin:0 0 24px;width:100%\"><img data-opt-id=508796906  fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"skip-lazy\" data-no-lazy=\"1\" loading=\"eager\" width=\"1024\" src=\"https:\/\/ml5psubhxdln.i.optimole.com\/cb:0e0_.b970\/w:auto\/h:auto\/q:mauto\/ig:avif\/https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2026\/08\/f-35-lightning-ii-formation-airpower.jpg\" alt=\"F-35 Lightning II fighters in formation\" style=\"width:100%;height:auto;max-width:100%;display:block\"><figcaption style=\"font-size:13px;color:#777;text-align:center;margin-top:6px;font-style:italic\">The United States operates a quarter of every military aircraft on the planet, and three quarters of the world&rsquo;s aerial tankers. US Air Force photo via Wikimedia Commons<\/figcaption><\/figure>\r\n\n<iframe class=\"mfg-embed skip-lazy\" data-no-lazy=\"1\" loading=\"eager\" data-mfg=\"airarms\" src=\"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2026\/08\/largest-air-forces-2026-fleet-table.html\" style=\"width:100%;border:0;display:block;margin:26px 0;overflow:hidden\" height=\"680\" scrolling=\"no\" title=\"MiGFlug data visual\"><\/iframe>\n\n<iframe class=\"mfg-embed skip-lazy\" data-no-lazy=\"1\" loading=\"eager\" data-mfg=\"airbar\" src=\"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2026\/08\/total-military-aircraft-2026-chart.html\" style=\"width:100%;border:0;display:block;margin:26px 0;overflow:hidden\" height=\"600\" scrolling=\"no\" title=\"MiGFlug data visual\"><\/iframe>\n\n<iframe class=\"mfg-embed skip-lazy\" data-no-lazy=\"1\" loading=\"eager\" data-mfg=\"airpie\" src=\"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2026\/08\/largest-air-arms-2026-share-pie.html\" style=\"width:100%;border:0;display:block;margin:26px 0;overflow:hidden\" height=\"560\" scrolling=\"no\" title=\"MiGFlug data visual\"><\/iframe>\n\r\n<div style=\"background:#f8f9fa;border-left:4px solid #1565c0;padding:20px 22px;margin:18px 0 24px;font-size:16px;line-height:1.7;display:flex;gap:20px;align-items:flex-start\"><div><em>&ldquo;The USA has 25% of all operational military aircraft, and heads all six equipment categories in our directory. Its numerical advantage ranges from having 19% of all combat aircraft and 28% of combat helicopters to 33% of special mission assets and 75% of all tankers.&rdquo;<\/em><div style=\"margin-top:10px;font-size:14px;color:#555\"><strong>Craig Hoyle<\/strong> &mdash; FlightGlobal, World Air Forces 2026, 13 November 2025<\/div><\/div><\/div>\r\n<p>That tanker figure is the one professionals notice. Combat aircraft can be bought; the ability to move them across an ocean and keep them there cannot. Three quarters of the world&rsquo;s aerial refuelling capacity belongs to one country, and it is the single clearest measure of who can actually fight far from home.<\/p><h2 style=\"padding-top:22px\">Fighters: Who Actually Has Them<\/h2><p>Total fleet size is a blunt instrument. It counts trainers, transports and helicopters alongside the aircraft that would actually contest an air battle. Strip it back to combat aircraft and the order changes immediately &mdash; China moves to the top.<\/p>\n<iframe class=\"mfg-embed skip-lazy\" data-no-lazy=\"1\" loading=\"eager\" data-mfg=\"fighters\" src=\"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2026\/08\/combat-aircraft-by-country-2026.html\" style=\"width:100%;border:0;display:block;margin:26px 0;overflow:hidden\" height=\"640\" scrolling=\"no\" title=\"MiGFlug data visual\"><\/iframe>\n<p>The column that matters is the third one. Roughly 1,300 of the world&rsquo;s 52,231 military aircraft are fifth-generation stealth fighters &mdash; about 2.5% of the total &mdash; and they are distributed more unequally than anything else on this page.<\/p>\n<iframe class=\"mfg-embed skip-lazy\" data-no-lazy=\"1\" loading=\"eager\" data-mfg=\"fifthgen\" src=\"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2026\/08\/fifth-generation-fighters-by-country-2026.html\" style=\"width:100%;border:0;display:block;margin:26px 0;overflow:hidden\" height=\"680\" scrolling=\"no\" title=\"MiGFlug data visual\"><\/iframe>\n\n<iframe class=\"mfg-embed skip-lazy\" data-no-lazy=\"1\" loading=\"eager\" data-mfg=\"fifthbar\" src=\"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2026\/08\/fifth-generation-fighters-chart-2026.html\" style=\"width:100%;border:0;display:block;margin:26px 0;overflow:hidden\" height=\"560\" scrolling=\"no\" title=\"MiGFlug data visual\"><\/iframe>\n<p>A definitional note first, because this label is abused more than any other in aviation. We count the <a href=\"https:\/\/migflug.com\/aircraft\/f-22-raptor\/\">F-22<\/a>, the <a href=\"https:\/\/migflug.com\/aircraft\/f-35-lightning-ii\/\">F-35<\/a>, the <a href=\"https:\/\/migflug.com\/aircraft\/j-20-mighty-dragon\/\">J-20<\/a>, the <a href=\"https:\/\/migflug.com\/aircraft\/shenyang-fc-31\/\">J-35<\/a> and &mdash; with reservations explained below &mdash; the <a href=\"https:\/\/migflug.com\/aircraft\/su-57-felon\/\">Su-57<\/a>. Aircraft still in development, such as Turkey&rsquo;s KAAN and South Korea&rsquo;s <a href=\"https:\/\/migflug.com\/aircraft\/kf-21-boramae\/\">KF-21<\/a>, are not counted. Nor are 4.5-generation types like the <a href=\"https:\/\/migflug.com\/aircraft\/f-15-eagle\/\">F-15EX<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/migflug.com\/aircraft\/rafale\/\">Rafale<\/a> or late-tranche <a href=\"https:\/\/migflug.com\/aircraft\/eurofighter-typhoon\/\">Typhoon<\/a>, which are in several respects more capable than the Su-57 despite the generational label.<\/p>\r\n<div style=\"background:#f8f9fa;border-left:4px solid #1565c0;padding:20px 22px;margin:18px 0 24px;font-size:16px;line-height:1.7;display:flex;gap:20px;align-items:flex-start\"><div><em>&ldquo;There is no universally accepted criterion for what does and does not count as a fifth-generation fighter, and manufacturers use these terms for marketing.&rdquo;<\/em><div style=\"margin-top:10px;font-size:14px;color:#555\"><strong>Aaron Spray<\/strong> &mdash; Aerospace Global News, Global air power rankings, October 2025<\/div><\/div><\/div>\r\n\r\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\" style=\"margin:0 0 24px;width:100%\"><img data-opt-id=1385362176  fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"skip-lazy\" data-no-lazy=\"1\" loading=\"eager\" width=\"1024\" src=\"https:\/\/ml5psubhxdln.i.optimole.com\/cb:0e0_.b970\/w:auto\/h:auto\/q:mauto\/ig:avif\/https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2026\/08\/chengdu-j-20-formation-fifth-generation-fighter.jpg\" alt=\"Chengdu J-20 fifth-generation fighters in formation\" style=\"width:100%;height:auto;max-width:100%;display:block\"><figcaption style=\"font-size:13px;color:#777;text-align:center;margin-top:6px;font-style:italic\">Chinese J-20s. China is now producing fifth-generation fighters faster than any other country, and is the only nation besides the United States fielding two stealth fighter types. Wikimedia Commons<\/figcaption><\/figure>\r\n<h2 style=\"padding-top:22px\">The Line That Puts It in Perspective<\/h2><p>Read the table again and note where Russia sits. The Netherlands &mdash; a country of 18 million people with a single fighter type &mdash; fields more fifth-generation aircraft than the Russian Federation.<\/p>\r\n<div style=\"background:#f8f9fa;border-left:4px solid #d32f2f;padding:20px 22px;margin:18px 0 24px;font-size:16px;line-height:1.7;display:flex;gap:20px;align-items:flex-start\"><div><em>&ldquo;Compared with the other fifth-generation jets, the Su-57 has a large radar cross section, exists in very small numbers, and has failed to make any impact in penetrating and dismantling Ukrainian air defence.&rdquo;<\/em><div style=\"margin-top:10px;font-size:14px;color:#555\"><strong>Aerospace Global News<\/strong> &mdash; Global air power rankings, October 2025<\/div><\/div><\/div>\r\n<p>Russia&rsquo;s difficulty is not design ambition but production. Sanctions have kept some of the Su-57&rsquo;s advertised systems out of the aircraft entirely, and serial deliveries have run at single digits a year. Algeria is expected to become the first export customer, with a reported order for twelve.<\/p><p>The opposite problem exists in the two categories nobody exports. The F-22 line closed in 2011 after 187 aircraft, and the United States has never sold one abroad. China applies the same ban to the J-20. Both countries keep their best air-superiority aircraft for themselves and export the multirole one &mdash; the F-35 for America, and probably the J-35 for China, which is openly touted for export.<\/p><p>Which leaves one asymmetry that matters more than any individual airframe. The F-35 has been ordered by around twenty countries. Every one of those fleets is interoperable, shares a common logistics chain, and can pass targeting data to the others. China&rsquo;s stealth fleet is larger than anyone&rsquo;s but Washington&rsquo;s, and it flies alone.<\/p><p>The counting caveat applies here too, as it does everywhere on this page. FlightGlobal&rsquo;s directory records 177 active F-22s and 883 F-35s worldwide, because it excludes aircraft in storage or undergoing upgrade. Lockheed Martin has delivered more than 1,300. Both numbers are correct; they answer different questions.<\/p><h2 style=\"padding-top:22px\">The Chinese Number That Jumped<\/h2><p>China&rsquo;s combat fleet rose 14.6% in a single edition, from 1,583 to 1,814. Almost none of that was new construction. It was a counting revision.<\/p>\r\n<div style=\"background:#f8f9fa;border-left:4px solid #ef6c00;padding:20px 22px;margin:18px 0 24px;font-size:16px;line-height:1.7;display:flex;gap:20px;align-items:flex-start\"><div><em>&ldquo;Multiple sources indicate that around 300 of the fifth-generation fighters have now been produced, so our estimate has been set at 250 operational examples; up from only 19 previously.&rdquo;<\/em><div style=\"margin-top:10px;font-size:14px;color:#555\"><strong>Craig Hoyle<\/strong> &mdash; FlightGlobal, World Air Forces 2026, on the J-20 estimate<\/div><\/div><\/div>\r\n<p>China is now building somewhere between 220 and 280 new fighters a year, on independent estimates. And the total above still excludes the Shenyang J-35 entirely &mdash; so the real figure is higher than 3,529.<\/p><p>There is a matching caution on the Russian side, in the opposite direction. FlightGlobal counts 1,559 Russian combat aircraft. Justin Bronk of RUSI, counting only genuinely serviceable modern types and discounting stored <a href=\"https:\/\/migflug.com\/aircraft\/mig-29-fulcrum\/\">MiG-29<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/migflug.com\/aircraft\/su-24-fencer\/\">Su-24<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/migflug.com\/aircraft\/su-25-frogfoot\/\">Su-25<\/a> airframes, arrives at roughly 545 to 560 fighters plus the bombers &mdash; a gap of about 2.4 times. Both numbers are defensible. They are answering different questions.<\/p>\r\n<div style=\"background:#f8f9fa;border-left:4px solid #d32f2f;padding:20px 22px;margin:18px 0 24px;font-size:16px;line-height:1.7;display:flex;gap:20px;align-items:flex-start\"><div><em>&ldquo;First, the impact of the attrition that the VKS has suffered during operations in Ukraine has been lower than would be suggested by the numbers of lost and damaged aircraft. In fact, the VKS&rsquo; fleet has expanded in that time.&rdquo;<\/em><div style=\"margin-top:10px;font-size:14px;color:#555\"><strong>Justin Bronk<\/strong> &mdash; Royal United Services Institute, The Evolution of Russian and Chinese Air Power Threats, January 2026<\/div><\/div><\/div>\r\n<h2 style=\"padding-top:22px\">Bombers: A Club of Three<\/h2><p>Only three countries operate strategic bombers. Everyone else&rsquo;s long-range strike is done with fighters, cruise missiles or not at all.<\/p>\n<iframe class=\"mfg-embed skip-lazy\" data-no-lazy=\"1\" loading=\"eager\" data-mfg=\"bombers\" src=\"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2026\/08\/strategic-bomber-fleets-2026.html\" style=\"width:100%;border:0;display:block;margin:26px 0;overflow:hidden\" height=\"360\" scrolling=\"no\" title=\"MiGFlug data visual\"><\/iframe>\n<p>The Russian caveat matters. Ukraine&rsquo;s June 2025 drone raid on Russian airbases reportedly destroyed around a fifth of Moscow&rsquo;s operational strategic bombers on the ground &mdash; aircraft that no longer exist but which still appear in inventories.<\/p><h2 style=\"padding-top:22px\">Part Three: Navies<\/h2><p>This is where counting becomes genuinely treacherous, and where most published comparisons are simply wrong.<\/p><h2 style=\"padding-top:22px\">Aircraft Carriers: Six Countries, Twenty Ships<\/h2>\n<iframe class=\"mfg-embed skip-lazy\" data-no-lazy=\"1\" loading=\"eager\" data-mfg=\"carriers\" src=\"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2026\/08\/aircraft-carriers-in-service-2026.html\" style=\"width:100%;border:0;display:block;margin:26px 0;overflow:hidden\" height=\"520\" scrolling=\"no\" title=\"MiGFlug data visual\"><\/iframe>\n\r\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\" style=\"margin:0 0 24px;width:100%\"><img data-opt-id=92849638  decoding=\"async\" class=\"skip-lazy\" data-no-lazy=\"1\" loading=\"eager\" width=\"1024\" src=\"https:\/\/ml5psubhxdln.i.optimole.com\/cb:0e0_.b970\/w:auto\/h:auto\/q:mauto\/ig:avif\/https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2026\/08\/chinese-aircraft-carrier-fujian-flight-deck.jpg\" alt=\"Flight deck of the Chinese aircraft carrier Fujian\" style=\"width:100%;height:auto;max-width:100%;display:block\"><figcaption style=\"font-size:13px;color:#777;text-align:center;margin-top:6px;font-style:italic\">Fujian, commissioned in November 2025, is the first carrier outside the US Navy to use electromagnetic catapults. Wikimedia Commons<\/figcaption><\/figure>\r\n<p>A fourth Chinese carrier is under construction at Dalian. Satellite imagery from May 2026 shows a hull about 286 metres long with two large compartments carrying the hallmarks of shielded reactor containment.<\/p>\r\n<div style=\"background:#f8f9fa;border-left:4px solid #ef6c00;padding:20px 22px;margin:18px 0 24px;font-size:16px;line-height:1.7;display:flex;gap:20px;align-items:flex-start\"><div><em>&ldquo;If China does build out such an extensive carrier fleet, it would represent a sea change in the global balance of military power. Doing so would allow it to not only close the quantitative gap with the U.S. Navy&rsquo;s eleven-carrier fleet, but also the qualitative gap if many of its new carriers feature advanced capabilities like nuclear propulsion.&rdquo;<\/em><div style=\"margin-top:10px;font-size:14px;color:#555\"><strong>CSIS Hidden Reach<\/strong> &mdash; Matthew Funaiole, Brian Hart, Aidan Powers-Riggs and Joseph Bermudez Jr., Tracking China&rsquo;s Fourth Aircraft Carrier, 21 May 2026<\/div><\/div><\/div>\r\n<p>The Pentagon&rsquo;s stated expectation, published in December 2025: the PLAN aims to produce six carriers by 2035, for a total of nine.<\/p>\r\n<div style=\"position:relative;padding-bottom:56.25%;height:0;overflow:hidden;margin:24px 0\"><iframe class=\"skip-lazy\" data-no-lazy=\"1\" loading=\"eager\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/LtblkuKN_d8\" style=\"position:absolute;top:0;left:0;width:100%;height:100%;border:0\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/div>\r\n<p style=\"font-size:14px;color:#666\"><em>The carriers currently under construction around the world, including China&rsquo;s Type 004 and France&rsquo;s nuclear-powered replacement for the Charles de Gaulle.<\/em><\/p>\r\n<div style=\"position:relative;padding-bottom:56.25%;height:0;overflow:hidden;margin:24px 0\"><iframe class=\"skip-lazy\" data-no-lazy=\"1\" loading=\"eager\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/H5FjW1MI-3U\" style=\"position:absolute;top:0;left:0;width:100%;height:100%;border:0\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/div>\r\n<p style=\"font-size:14px;color:#666\"><em>Every aircraft carrier in service in 2026, country by country.<\/em><\/p><h2 style=\"padding-top:22px\">Warships: The 291-or-461 Problem<\/h2><p>Ask how many ships the US Navy has and the honest answer is another question: counted how?<\/p><p>The US counting rule is a Navy instruction, not a law. It admits commissioned warships and certain support vessels, and excludes patrol craft, unmanned vessels, tugs, barges, hospital ships and most sealift. On that rule the US Navy had <strong>293<\/strong> battle-force ships in October 2025. Count every hull of every kind and the same navy is <strong>461<\/strong>.<\/p>\r\n<div style=\"background:#f8f9fa;border-left:4px solid #1565c0;padding:20px 22px;margin:18px 0 24px;font-size:16px;line-height:1.7;display:flex;gap:20px;align-items:flex-start\"><div><em>&ldquo;As a general rule to avoid potential statistical distortions, comparisons of the number of ships in the Navy over time should use, whenever possible, a single counting method.&rdquo;<\/em><div style=\"margin-top:10px;font-size:14px;color:#555\"><strong>Congressional Research Service<\/strong> &mdash; Ronald O&rsquo;Rourke, Navy Force Structure and Shipbuilding Plans, RL32665, 20 January 2026<\/div><\/div><\/div>\r\n<p>The same trap applies to the famous China comparison. The Pentagon&rsquo;s last published figure had the PLAN at <strong>over 370 battle-force ships<\/strong> against the US Navy&rsquo;s 291 &mdash; and contrary to a widespread claim, that Chinese figure explicitly <em>excludes<\/em> around 60 missile-armed patrol catamarans. It is not padded with speedboats.<\/p><p>Worth noting for anyone quoting the Pentagon: the December 2025 edition of the China Military Power Report dropped the battle-force number entirely. The last published figure dates from the 2024 edition.<\/p>\n<iframe class=\"mfg-embed skip-lazy\" data-no-lazy=\"1\" loading=\"eager\" data-mfg=\"fleets\" src=\"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2026\/08\/major-navies-fleet-hull-count-2026.html\" style=\"width:100%;border:0;display:block;margin:26px 0;overflow:hidden\" height=\"600\" scrolling=\"no\" title=\"MiGFlug data visual\"><\/iframe>\n<h2 style=\"padding-top:22px\">Why &ldquo;Destroyer&rdquo; Means Nothing<\/h2><p>The column above is close to meaningless without this warning, so here it is plainly. Ship classes are national branding decisions, not engineering categories.<\/p><p>China&rsquo;s Type 055 displaces 12,000 to 13,000 tonnes. The Pentagon calls it a cruiser; China calls it a destroyer. China&rsquo;s &ldquo;cruiser&rdquo; count in American tables jumped from zero to eight purely because of US naming convention.<\/p><p>Germany has not rated a ship as a destroyer since 2003 &mdash; as deliberate policy, to symbolically underline military restraint &mdash; despite operating 7,000-tonne frigates. France and Italy operate the <em>identical<\/em> Horizon-class hull with the identical missile system: France calls it a frigate, Italy calls it a destroyer. Britain&rsquo;s Type 26 frigate outweighs its Type 45 destroyer. Italy&rsquo;s 6,000-tonne, 16-cell PPA is officially an offshore patrol vessel; Indonesia bought two and commissioned them as frigates. Iran calls 1,500-tonne ships destroyers; US naval intelligence classifies them as corvettes.<\/p><p>Compare hull counts across navies without reading the definitions and you are comparing marketing departments.<\/p>\r\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\" style=\"margin:0 0 24px;width:100%\"><img data-opt-id=1499348071  decoding=\"async\" class=\"skip-lazy\" data-no-lazy=\"1\" loading=\"eager\" width=\"1024\" src=\"https:\/\/ml5psubhxdln.i.optimole.com\/cb:0e0_.b970\/w:auto\/h:auto\/q:mauto\/ig:avif\/https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2026\/08\/nimitz-class-carrier-flight-deck-operations.jpg\" alt=\"Flight deck operations aboard a Nimitz-class aircraft carrier\" style=\"width:100%;height:auto;max-width:100%;display:block\"><figcaption style=\"font-size:13px;color:#777;text-align:center;margin-top:6px;font-style:italic\">US carriers and amphibious ships account for roughly 90% of the tonnage gap between the American and Chinese fleets. US Navy photo via Wikimedia Commons<\/figcaption><\/figure>\r\n<h2 style=\"padding-top:22px\">Tonnage, Missile Cells and the Better Questions<\/h2><p>Because hull counts are so unreliable, analysts prefer tonnage. Here honesty requires an admission: <strong>no current aggregate tonnage figure for either navy exists from an authoritative public source.<\/strong> The comparison everyone repeats rests on a 2018 Brookings estimate &mdash; the US Navy at roughly twice China&rsquo;s tonnage, a gap of about three million tons &mdash; and a 2024 CSIS study. Anyone quoting a 2026 tonnage figure is inventing it.<\/p><p>What CSIS did establish in 2024 is more interesting than the raw number.<\/p>\r\n<div style=\"background:#f8f9fa;border-left:4px solid #d32f2f;padding:20px 22px;margin:18px 0 24px;font-size:16px;line-height:1.7;display:flex;gap:20px;align-items:flex-start\"><div><em>&ldquo;U.S. aircraft carriers and amphibious assault ships account for about 90 percent of the displacement gap. If carriers turn out to be of limited value for modern naval warfare, much of the U.S. displacement advantage disappears, and recent rates of expansion suggest that China can probably surpass the United States in aggregate displacement of cruisers, destroyers, and frigates in less than ten years.&rdquo;<\/em><div style=\"margin-top:10px;font-size:14px;color:#555\"><strong>Alexander Palmer, Henry Carroll and Nicholas Velazquez<\/strong> &mdash; CSIS, Unpacking China&rsquo;s Naval Buildup, 5 June 2024<\/div><\/div><\/div>\r\n<p>Better metrics exist. Vertical launch cells &mdash; the actual magazine depth of a fleet &mdash; put the US Navy at around 9,900 against the PLAN&rsquo;s 4,200. That still sounds comfortable until you see the trend: in 2004 the ratio was 222 to one.<\/p>\n<iframe class=\"mfg-embed skip-lazy\" data-no-lazy=\"1\" loading=\"eager\" data-mfg=\"measures\" src=\"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2026\/08\/us-china-navy-vls-tonnage-shipbuilding-2026.html\" style=\"width:100%;border:0;display:block;margin:26px 0;overflow:hidden\" height=\"440\" scrolling=\"no\" title=\"MiGFlug data visual\"><\/iframe>\n<p>That last line is the one that keeps American planners awake. The ONI slide put Chinese shipyard capacity at over 23 million tons against under 100,000 for the United States &mdash; a ratio of more than 230 to one. The US Navy confirmed the slide was genuine while cautioning it was drawn from public sources and was never meant as a deep analysis of Chinese commercial shipbuilding.<\/p>\r\n<div style=\"position:relative;padding-bottom:56.25%;height:0;overflow:hidden;margin:24px 0\"><iframe class=\"skip-lazy\" data-no-lazy=\"1\" loading=\"eager\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/SgkSjtxwJeE\" style=\"position:absolute;top:0;left:0;width:100%;height:100%;border:0\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/div>\r\n<p style=\"font-size:14px;color:#666\"><em>Carrier size compared &mdash; the United States, China and the United Kingdom side by side.<\/em><\/p><h2 style=\"padding-top:22px\">Part Four: People<\/h2><p>Manpower has its own version of the definitions problem: authorised strength, funded billets and actual serving headcount are three different numbers, and countries quote whichever flatters them.<\/p>\n<iframe class=\"mfg-embed skip-lazy\" data-no-lazy=\"1\" loading=\"eager\" data-mfg=\"troops\" src=\"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2026\/08\/active-military-personnel-top-15-2026.html\" style=\"width:100%;border:0;display:block;margin:26px 0;overflow:hidden\" height=\"720\" scrolling=\"no\" title=\"MiGFlug data visual\"><\/iframe>\n\n<iframe class=\"mfg-embed skip-lazy\" data-no-lazy=\"1\" loading=\"eager\" data-mfg=\"gap\" src=\"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2026\/08\/military-recruitment-gap-authorised-vs-actual.html\" style=\"width:100%;border:0;display:block;margin:26px 0;overflow:hidden\" height=\"360\" scrolling=\"no\" title=\"MiGFlug data visual\"><\/iframe>\n<h2 style=\"padding-top:22px\">Military Spending Per Soldier<\/h2><p>Put the two halves of this article together &mdash; the money and the manpower &mdash; and a third number falls out: what a country actually spends per person in uniform. It is one of the more revealing figures in defence economics, because it separates mass from capability.<\/p><p>There is a complication, and it is the reason this comparison is usually done badly. Converting budgets at market exchange rates assumes a dollar buys the same amount of defence everywhere. It does not. A Russian conscript, an Indian mechanic and an American staff sergeant are paid in different currencies at wildly different local costs, while a fighter jet is priced globally in dollars.<\/p><p>The economist Peter Robertson built a measure for exactly this: military purchasing power parity, which prices personnel, operations and equipment separately rather than applying a single blunt GDP-PPP factor. Both views are below.<\/p>\n<iframe class=\"mfg-embed skip-lazy\" data-no-lazy=\"1\" loading=\"eager\" data-mfg=\"persoldier\" src=\"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2026\/08\/military-spending-per-soldier-2025.html\" style=\"width:100%;border:0;display:block;margin:26px 0;overflow:hidden\" height=\"560\" scrolling=\"no\" title=\"MiGFlug data visual\"><\/iframe>\n\n<iframe class=\"mfg-embed skip-lazy\" data-no-lazy=\"1\" loading=\"eager\" data-mfg=\"persolbar\" src=\"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2026\/08\/cost-per-soldier-market-vs-ppp-2025.html\" style=\"width:100%;border:0;display:block;margin:26px 0;overflow:hidden\" height=\"700\" scrolling=\"no\" title=\"MiGFlug data visual\"><\/iframe>\n<p>The headline is the American one. The United States spends about <strong>$742,000 per active service member per year<\/strong> &mdash; and because the US is the base country for the index, that figure is the same on either measure. Nobody else is close. Even after purchasing-power adjustment more than doubles Russia&rsquo;s effective budget, Russia still spends barely half as much per soldier as America does.<\/p><p>The adjustment matters enormously for everyone else, though. At market rates India appears to spend $67,000 per soldier; in military-PPP terms it is $245,000, a 3.7-fold uplift and the largest in the table. China moves from $165,000 to $301,000, Indonesia from $35,000 to $118,000. These are not accounting tricks &mdash; they are an attempt to answer what the money actually buys at home.<\/p><p>Read the two columns together and the shape of each force appears. China fields the largest army on earth and spends less per head than Russia does. The United States fields a force barely two thirds the size of China&rsquo;s and spends two and a half times as much on each person in it. That difference &mdash; not the headline budget, and not the headcount &mdash; is most of what people mean when they talk about a quality gap.<\/p><p>One honest caveat. Six of the fifteen largest armed forces cannot appear here at all: North Korea, Pakistan, Iran, Vietnam, Egypt and Thailand publish too little for a military-PPP estimate to be built. Their absence is itself informative.<\/p><p>Demographics are quietly becoming the binding constraint. South Korea has gone from 563,000 active personnel in 2019 to about 450,000 in 2025, and projects 290,000 by 2030 &mdash; not through policy, but through birth rates. India loses around 60,000 people a year to attrition. The US Navy is roughly 20,000 sailors short at sea.<\/p>\r\n<div style=\"background:#f8f9fa;border-left:4px solid #ef6c00;padding:20px 22px;margin:18px 0 24px;font-size:16px;line-height:1.7;display:flex;gap:20px;align-items:flex-start\"><div><em>&ldquo;The acquisition of the most advanced fighter aircraft is of little strategic value if there are insufficient personnel to operate them. This is no longer a concern for the distant future&mdash;it is an immediate and pressing reality.&rdquo;<\/em><div style=\"margin-top:10px;font-size:14px;color:#555\"><strong>Tomohiro Sato<\/strong> &mdash; Foreign Policy at Brookings, The personnel base of the Japan Self-Defense Forces in an era of demographic decline, October 2025<\/div><\/div><\/div>\r\n<h2 style=\"padding-top:22px\">What None of These Numbers Tell You<\/h2><p>Every table above measures inventory. War is decided by things inventories cannot capture, and it is worth being explicit about the gaps.<\/p><p><strong>Readiness.<\/strong> FlightGlobal counts aircraft not recorded as in storage or undergoing upgrade. That is an accounting definition, not a statement that they can fly tomorrow. Of Russia&rsquo;s nine Akula-class attack submarines, five are in refit and one is in reserve &mdash; leaving perhaps three available from a paper fleet of nine.<\/p><p><strong>Munitions.<\/strong> Nobody publishes credible stockpile figures. A fleet of aircraft with two weeks of precision weapons is a two-week air force, and several NATO members discovered exactly this after 2022.<\/p><p><strong>Logistics and training.<\/strong> Tankers, transports, spare parts and flying hours decide whether a force can be used. The tanker column is the closest proxy on this page, and it is brutally lopsided.<\/p><p><strong>The counting problem cuts both ways.<\/strong> The most instructive example of 2026 came from the Gulf. After the campaign against Iran, US Central Command reported that a fleet which had eleven ships in the Gulf of Oman had none. Yet analysts assessed that 80 to 90% of Iran&rsquo;s small boats and minelaying craft survived &mdash; and those are the vessels that actually threaten shipping in the Strait of Hormuz. The ships that appeared in the tables were destroyed. The ships that never appeared in any table are the ones that still matter.<\/p><h2 style=\"padding-top:22px\">The Shape of It<\/h2><p>Strip out the detail and four things are happening at once.<\/p><p>The United States retains an enormous, and in some categories overwhelming, lead &mdash; a quarter of the world&rsquo;s military aircraft, three quarters of its tankers, eleven carriers, two thirds of the world&rsquo;s nuclear submarines and a third of all military spending. That lead is real and it is not close to disappearing.<\/p><p>China is closing specific gaps very quickly, and has already passed the US on hull count, on warships over 1,000 tonnes, on fleet age, on auxiliaries and on shipbuilding capacity by a factor of over two hundred. Its 31st consecutive annual spending increase is the longest unbroken run in SIPRI&rsquo;s entire database.<\/p><p>Europe is rearming faster than at any point since the early 1950s, from a very low base, and mostly by writing cheques rather than by fielding new units &mdash; the equipment those budgets buy will not arrive for years.<\/p><p>And the constraint everyone is running into is not money. It is people, shipyards and production lines. Japan cannot fill its ranks. Korea is shrinking by demography. The United States can fund carriers faster than it can build them. In that world, the twenty-year spending trend at the top of this article is a better guide to 2040 than any inventory table below it.<\/p><p><em>Sources: SIPRI, Trends in World Military Expenditure 2025 (April 2026) and the SIPRI Military Expenditure Database; FlightGlobal World Air Forces 2026 with data partner Cirium; US Congressional Research Service reports RL32665 and RL33153 by Ronald O&rsquo;Rourke; US Department of Defense, Military and Security Developments Involving the People&rsquo;s Republic of China (2024 and 2025 editions); CSIS, Unpacking China&rsquo;s Naval Buildup (2024) and Hidden Reach (2026); RUSI; IISS Military Balance; US Naval Institute News; Naval News; NATO; national defence ministries.<\/em><\/p><p style=\"font-size:13px;color:#777\"><em>A note on method: every figure carries its source and year. Where sources disagree, both are given rather than averaged. Where no authoritative figure exists &mdash; current fleet tonnage, most national drone inventories &mdash; we have said so instead of estimating.<\/em><\/p>\r\n<div style=\"background:#f0f4ff;border-left:4px solid #5C91FF;padding:16px 20px;margin:32px 0 8px\"><p style=\"margin:0 0 8px;font-weight:600;color:#333\">Related Posts<\/p><p style=\"margin:4px 0\"><a href=\"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/china-j-20-j-35-stealth-fighter-production-numbers-2030\/\">China Doesn&rsquo;t Need the Best Stealth Jet &mdash; Just the Most<\/a><\/p><p style=\"margin:4px 0\"><a href=\"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/f-22-raptor-winner-america-stopped-building\/\">F-22 Raptor: The Winner America Stopped Building<\/a><\/p><p style=\"margin:4px 0\"><a href=\"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/iran-war-us-cost-aircraft-losses-munitions-overview-2026\/\">What the Iran War Has Cost America So Far<\/a><\/p><p style=\"margin:4px 0\"><a href=\"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/india-rafale-mrfa-source-code-dispute-france-2026\/\">India&rsquo;s Rafale Deal Hits a Firewall<\/a><\/p><\/div>\r\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The world spent $2,887 billion on defence in 2025. Here is what it bought: aircraft, carriers, warships, submarines and troops, country by country \u2014 with every source, every date, and every definitional trap flagged.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":23,"featured_media":13609290,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"editor_notices":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[665,664],"tags":[675],"class_list":["post-13610376","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-aviation-world","category-military-aviation","tag-priority-1"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v28.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>World Military Strength Compared: The 2026 Numbers<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Aircraft, fifth-generation fighters, carriers, warships, submarines, troops and spending for every major military power, with sources and dates.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/es\/world-military-strength-compared-aircraft-ships-troops-spending-2026\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"es_ES\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"World Military Strength Compared: The 2026 Numbers\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Aircraft, fifth-generation fighters, carriers, warships, submarines, troops and spending for every major military power, with sources and dates.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/es\/world-military-strength-compared-aircraft-ships-troops-spending-2026\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Afterburner - MiGFlug&#039;s Magazine\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/MiGFlug\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-08-18T12:58:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-08-19T09:25:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/ml5psubhxdln.i.optimole.com\/cb:0e0_.b970\/w:1280\/h:852\/q:mauto\/ig:avif\/https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2026\/08\/f-35-lightning-ii-formation-airpower.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1280\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"852\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Max Gr\u00fcnwald\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@migflug\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@migflug\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Max Gr\u00fcnwald\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"30 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/world-military-strength-compared-aircraft-ships-troops-spending-2026\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/world-military-strength-compared-aircraft-ships-troops-spending-2026\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Max Gr\u00fcnwald\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/it\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/da89e4a5834c9a932ee20751ed75569c\"},\"headline\":\"The World&rsquo;s Militaries, Counted\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-08-18T12:58:06+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-08-19T09:25:04+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/world-military-strength-compared-aircraft-ships-troops-spending-2026\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":3833,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/it\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/world-military-strength-compared-aircraft-ships-troops-spending-2026\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\/\\/migflug.com\\/afterburner\\/wp-content\\/uploads\\/sites\\/4\\/2026\\/08\\/f-35-lightning-ii-formation-airpower.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"priority-1\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Aviation World\",\"Military Aviation\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/world-military-strength-compared-aircraft-ships-troops-spending-2026\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/world-military-strength-compared-aircraft-ships-troops-spending-2026\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/world-military-strength-compared-aircraft-ships-troops-spending-2026\\\/\",\"name\":\"World Military Strength Compared: The 2026 Numbers\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/it\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/world-military-strength-compared-aircraft-ships-troops-spending-2026\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/world-military-strength-compared-aircraft-ships-troops-spending-2026\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\/\\/migflug.com\\/afterburner\\/wp-content\\/uploads\\/sites\\/4\\/2026\\/08\\/f-35-lightning-ii-formation-airpower.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-08-18T12:58:06+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-08-19T09:25:04+00:00\",\"description\":\"Aircraft, fifth-generation fighters, carriers, warships, submarines, troops and spending for every major military power, with sources and dates.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/world-military-strength-compared-aircraft-ships-troops-spending-2026\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/world-military-strength-compared-aircraft-ships-troops-spending-2026\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/world-military-strength-compared-aircraft-ships-troops-spending-2026\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\/\\/migflug.com\\/afterburner\\/wp-content\\/uploads\\/sites\\/4\\/2026\\/08\\/f-35-lightning-ii-formation-airpower.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\/\\/migflug.com\\/afterburner\\/wp-content\\/uploads\\/sites\\/4\\/2026\\/08\\/f-35-lightning-ii-formation-airpower.jpg\",\"width\":1280,\"height\":852,\"caption\":\"F-35 Lightning IIs fly in formation over Madison, Wis., during a joint training mission with the 148th Fighter Wing based in Duluth, Minn., June 23, 2025. The exercise aimed to strengthen coordination and operational effectiveness between units. (U.S. Air National Guard photo by Senior Airman Addie Peterson)\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/world-military-strength-compared-aircraft-ships-troops-spending-2026\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Startseite\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/it\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The World&rsquo;s Militaries, Counted\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/it\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/it\\\/\",\"name\":\"Afterburner - MiGFlug's Magazine\",\"description\":\"for those interested in flying military jets and aviation related  topics\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/it\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/it\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/it\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"MiGFlug GmbH\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/it\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/it\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\/\\/ml5psubhxdln.i.optimole.com\\/cb:0e0_.b970\\/w:897\\/h:278\\/q:mauto\\/ig:avif\\/https:\\/\\/migflug.com\\/afterburner\\/wp-content\\/uploads\\/sites\\/4\\/2026\\/06\\/MIGFLUG_LOGO-no-background.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\/\\/ml5psubhxdln.i.optimole.com\\/cb:0e0_.b970\\/w:897\\/h:278\\/q:mauto\\/ig:avif\\/https:\\/\\/migflug.com\\/afterburner\\/wp-content\\/uploads\\/sites\\/4\\/2026\\/06\\/MIGFLUG_LOGO-no-background.png\",\"width\":897,\"height\":278,\"caption\":\"MiGFlug GmbH\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/it\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/MiGFlug\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/migflug\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.instagram.com\\\/migflug\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/user\\\/MiGFlug\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/company\\\/migflug.com\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.pinterest.ch\\\/migflug\\\/\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/it\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/da89e4a5834c9a932ee20751ed75569c\",\"name\":\"Max Gr\u00fcnwald\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4a7af37924a5c24d0712babd0e5eafec09d37b3a41831dd4c4ee30f54ebfc1a7?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4a7af37924a5c24d0712babd0e5eafec09d37b3a41831dd4c4ee30f54ebfc1a7?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4a7af37924a5c24d0712babd0e5eafec09d37b3a41831dd4c4ee30f54ebfc1a7?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Max Gr\u00fcnwald\"},\"description\":\"Max Gr\u00fcnwald writes MiGFlug\u2019s technical deep-dives \u2014 engines, avionics and weapons systems, with every number checked twice.\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/es\\\/author\\\/maxgruenwald\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"World Military Strength Compared: The 2026 Numbers","description":"Aircraft, fifth-generation fighters, carriers, warships, submarines, troops and spending for every major military power, with sources and dates.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/es\/world-military-strength-compared-aircraft-ships-troops-spending-2026\/","og_locale":"es_ES","og_type":"article","og_title":"World Military Strength Compared: The 2026 Numbers","og_description":"Aircraft, fifth-generation fighters, carriers, warships, submarines, troops and spending for every major military power, with sources and dates.","og_url":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/es\/world-military-strength-compared-aircraft-ships-troops-spending-2026\/","og_site_name":"Afterburner - MiGFlug's Magazine","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/MiGFlug\/","article_published_time":"2026-08-18T12:58:06+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-08-19T09:25:04+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1280,"height":852,"url":"https:\/\/ml5psubhxdln.i.optimole.com\/cb:0e0_.b970\/w:1280\/h:852\/q:mauto\/ig:avif\/https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2026\/08\/f-35-lightning-ii-formation-airpower.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Max Gr\u00fcnwald","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@migflug","twitter_site":"@migflug","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Max Gr\u00fcnwald","Est. reading time":"30 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/world-military-strength-compared-aircraft-ships-troops-spending-2026\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/world-military-strength-compared-aircraft-ships-troops-spending-2026\/"},"author":{"name":"Max Gr\u00fcnwald","@id":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/it\/#\/schema\/person\/da89e4a5834c9a932ee20751ed75569c"},"headline":"The World&rsquo;s Militaries, Counted","datePublished":"2026-08-18T12:58:06+00:00","dateModified":"2026-08-19T09:25:04+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/world-military-strength-compared-aircraft-ships-troops-spending-2026\/"},"wordCount":3833,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/it\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/world-military-strength-compared-aircraft-ships-troops-spending-2026\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/ml5psubhxdln.i.optimole.com\/cb:0e0_.b970\/w:auto\/h:auto\/q:mauto\/ig:avif\/https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2026\/08\/f-35-lightning-ii-formation-airpower.jpg","keywords":["priority-1"],"articleSection":["Aviation World","Military Aviation"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/world-military-strength-compared-aircraft-ships-troops-spending-2026\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/world-military-strength-compared-aircraft-ships-troops-spending-2026\/","url":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/world-military-strength-compared-aircraft-ships-troops-spending-2026\/","name":"World Military Strength Compared: The 2026 Numbers","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/it\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/world-military-strength-compared-aircraft-ships-troops-spending-2026\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/world-military-strength-compared-aircraft-ships-troops-spending-2026\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/ml5psubhxdln.i.optimole.com\/cb:0e0_.b970\/w:auto\/h:auto\/q:mauto\/ig:avif\/https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2026\/08\/f-35-lightning-ii-formation-airpower.jpg","datePublished":"2026-08-18T12:58:06+00:00","dateModified":"2026-08-19T09:25:04+00:00","description":"Aircraft, fifth-generation fighters, carriers, warships, submarines, troops and spending for every major military power, with sources and dates.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/world-military-strength-compared-aircraft-ships-troops-spending-2026\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/world-military-strength-compared-aircraft-ships-troops-spending-2026\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/world-military-strength-compared-aircraft-ships-troops-spending-2026\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/ml5psubhxdln.i.optimole.com\/cb:0e0_.b970\/w:auto\/h:auto\/q:mauto\/ig:avif\/https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2026\/08\/f-35-lightning-ii-formation-airpower.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/ml5psubhxdln.i.optimole.com\/cb:0e0_.b970\/w:auto\/h:auto\/q:mauto\/ig:avif\/https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2026\/08\/f-35-lightning-ii-formation-airpower.jpg","width":1280,"height":852,"caption":"F-35 Lightning IIs fly in formation over Madison, Wis., during a joint training mission with the 148th Fighter Wing based in Duluth, Minn., June 23, 2025. The exercise aimed to strengthen coordination and operational effectiveness between units. (U.S. Air National Guard photo by Senior Airman Addie Peterson)"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/world-military-strength-compared-aircraft-ships-troops-spending-2026\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Startseite","item":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/it\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The World&rsquo;s Militaries, Counted"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/it\/#website","url":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/it\/","name":"Postcombusti\u00f3n - Revista de MiGFlug","description":"Para aquellos interesados en pilotar aviones militares y temas relacionados con la aviaci\u00f3n.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/it\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/it\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/it\/#organization","name":"MiGFlug GmbH","url":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/it\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/it\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/ml5psubhxdln.i.optimole.com\/cb:0e0_.b970\/w:897\/h:278\/q:mauto\/ig:avif\/https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2026\/06\/MIGFLUG_LOGO-no-background.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/ml5psubhxdln.i.optimole.com\/cb:0e0_.b970\/w:897\/h:278\/q:mauto\/ig:avif\/https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2026\/06\/MIGFLUG_LOGO-no-background.png","width":897,"height":278,"caption":"MiGFlug GmbH"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/it\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/MiGFlug\/","https:\/\/x.com\/migflug","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/migflug\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/MiGFlug","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/migflug.com\/","https:\/\/www.pinterest.ch\/migflug\/"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/it\/#\/schema\/person\/da89e4a5834c9a932ee20751ed75569c","name":"Max Gr\u00fcnwald","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4a7af37924a5c24d0712babd0e5eafec09d37b3a41831dd4c4ee30f54ebfc1a7?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4a7af37924a5c24d0712babd0e5eafec09d37b3a41831dd4c4ee30f54ebfc1a7?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4a7af37924a5c24d0712babd0e5eafec09d37b3a41831dd4c4ee30f54ebfc1a7?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Max Gr\u00fcnwald"},"description":"Max Gr\u00fcnwald escribe los an\u00e1lisis t\u00e9cnicos en profundidad de MiGFlug: motores, avi\u00f3nica y sistemas de armamento, con cada dato verificado dos veces.","url":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/es\/author\/maxgruenwald\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13610376","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/23"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13610376"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13610376\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":13887187,"href":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13610376\/revisions\/13887187"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/13609290"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13610376"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13610376"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13610376"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}