“The F-22 could return” is back in the headlines. Reports this week claim the United States is examining new production of the F-22 Raptor, the stealth fighter whose line closed in 2011. It is an irresistible story. It is also, on the evidence available, not what is happening.
There is no bill to restart production, no funded programme, no formal study request and no Air Force plan. What does exist is a real vote in Congress to keep every existing Raptor flying until at least 2032, and a long-running debate about whether America made a mistake stopping at 187. Here is what is real, and what is not.
Informations clés
- Construit: 195 total, incl. 8 test aircraft; 187 production jets
- Original requirement: 750
- Fin de la production : December 2011; last delivery May 2012
- En service : About 184
- 2017 restart estimate: ~$50 billion for 194 jets ($206–216M each)
- 2026 decision: House committee bans F-22 retirements until 30 Sept 2032
- Restart status: No bill, study request or funding
Where the story comes from
The latest wave of “restart” coverage traces back to a paywalled commentary from the French defence site Meta-Defense on 21 September, which said restart hypotheses were circulating at the Pentagon and in Congress. It named no lawmaker, bill, hearing or study. Other outlets then repeated the idea with firmer headlines.
The concrete development is older and more modest. On 4 June 2026 the House Armed Services Committee adopted an amendment from Rep. Austin Scott of Georgia, home state of the Marietta plant where the Raptor was built, extending the ban on F-22 retirements from September 2027 to 30 September 2032. It covers all 184 jets, including the 32 older Block 20 aircraft the Air Force had tried to retire as training-only. The Air Force has stopped asking to retire them and no longer opposes the extension. Scott’s amendment did ask for a restart feasibility briefing, but for the C-17 transport, not the F-22.
How America ended up with 187
The Air Force once planned to buy 750 Advanced Tactical Fighters. That number shrank through the 1990s, and in 2009 Defense Secretary Robert Gates capped production at 187 operational jets. His argument was that the Raptor was superb but specialised, and that the money was better spent elsewhere, above all on the F-35.
“The F-22 is clearly a capability we do need, a niche, silver-bullet solution for one or two potential scenarios.”
Robert Gates, US Secretary of Defense, speech to the Economic Club of Chicago, July 2009
The Senate backed him that July, voting 58 to 40 to strip funding for more Raptors. The final Raptor rolled out in Marietta in December 2011 and was delivered in May 2012. Because a 1998 law bars foreign sales, there was never an export order to keep the line warm, as happened with the F-15 and F-16. The full story is in F-22 Raptor : Le vainqueur que l’Amérique a cessé de construire.
What a restart would actually cost
Congress has asked this question before. In 2016 it ordered the Air Force to study restarting the line, and the answer arrived in 2017: about $50 billion to build 194 more F-22s. That included $7 billion to $10 billion just to restart production, and it put each new jet at roughly $206 million to $216 million, against about $137 million for the last ones built.
“The startup costs are significant and very expensive. Our plan is to put any resources we have into that roadmap and not into restarting a line from an older aircraft.”
Heather Wilson, then Secretary of the Air Force, 2017
Those were 2017 dollars, and the problem has grown since. Lockheed Martin stored tooling and recorded how the jet was built, but the workforce has moved on, Marietta now builds C-130Js, and many of the Raptor’s 1990s-era electronics and suppliers no longer exist. A “new” F-22 would need new avionics and a new production system. In practice it would be a new programme, competing for the same money as its intended successor.
Why the idea will not go away
If a restart is so impractical, why does it keep coming back? Because the arguments for more Raptors are real. China keeps adding J-20 stealth fighters, and its fleet is now counted in the hundreds. The US Air Force fighter fleet is already below the minimum set by Congress, as we reported in USAF Fighter Fleet: 47 Jets Below the Legal Minimum. And the F-47 will not fly until 2028 or enter service until the 2030s.
What Washington has actually chosen is the cheaper route: keep every Raptor it has, keep upgrading them, and put new money into the F-47 and the engines it needs. The 2032 retirement ban fits that plan exactly. A production restart does not, and until a bill, a budget line or a Pentagon request appears, “the F-22 is coming back” remains a headline rather than a decision.
Foire aux questions
Is the US restarting F-22 production?
How many F-22 Raptors were built?
How much would it cost to restart F-22 production?
Why did the US stop building the F-22?
What is the F-22 retirement ban until 2032?
What will replace the F-22?
Sources: Air & Space Forces Magazine, “House Panel Votes to Prohibit F-22 Retirements Through 2032” (June 2026); The War Zone, 2017 F-22 restart study; US Department of Defense, Gates speech to the Economic Club of Chicago (July 2009); Meta-Defense (21 September 2026); Defense One and Air & Space Forces Magazine on the F-47 schedule.
0 Comments