{"id":2233,"date":"2014-08-29T09:16:10","date_gmt":"2014-08-29T09:16:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.migflug.com\/jetflights\/?p=2233"},"modified":"2026-09-04T09:48:38","modified_gmt":"2026-09-04T07:48:38","slug":"valkyrie-russe-sukhoi-t-4","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/fr\/russian-valkyrie-sukhoi-t-4\/","title":{"rendered":"Sukhoi T-4 \u2013 La Valkyrie russe"},"content":{"rendered":"

The American XB-70 Valkyrie<\/a> was a one-of-a-kind aircraft when North American Aviation first displayed it. On the other side of the world, the other superpower was building its own supersonic strategic bomber. This Soviet aircraft - the Sukhoi T-4 - is the subject of this article, with some comparison to the XB-70 Valkyrie. They were both big supersonic bombers designed to fly at speeds as high as Mach 3.0. But the Su T-4 unfortunately never got there - what happened on the way?<\/p>\r\n\r\n

The complexity of the T-4<\/h1>\r\n
\"\"

The Sukhoi T-4<\/p><\/div>\r\n

As mentioned its name was Sukhoi T-4, however many names have been used for it, such as Aircraft 100, Project 100 and Sotka. After Sukhoi won the design contest held by Soviet leaders \u2014 thanks to their design\u2019s projected speed of 3,200 km\/h \u2014 they began building the first prototype. The engineering of the Sukhoi T-4 was extremely demanding, with an enormous amount of innovation and new-thinking compared to other military projects. It featured over 600 patents and new inventions to be built such as new technologies, machinery and materials to be able to build an aircraft that was to fly at sustained speed of mach 3+ - \u00a0the Speed the Valkyrie was capable of.<\/p>\r\n

The materials of the T-100 were, just like on the XB-70, mainly stainless steel and titanium. It also featured a fly-by-wire control and a mechanical system if the FBW would fail. When landing, the nose could be lowered to provide better visibility to the pilot, and parachutes were used to slow the aircraft down once it had touched down. However when flying, the nose could not be lowered, and therefore the pilot's view was in steep upward direction - into the sky. This was worsening and limiting \u00a0the visuality of the pilot and so a periscope was installed to make it possible for the pilot to look forward when flying, however this could only be used at speeds of up to 600 km\/h.<\/p>\r\n\r\n

The specifications of the supersonic T-4<\/h1>\r\n
\"\"

Similarities of the T-4 and the B-70<\/p><\/div>\r\n

After the \u201c101\u201d (the first T-4) had been built, there were a lot of testing on it. The test pilot, son of the famous engineer Iluyshin who founded the Iluyshin aircraft design bureau, flew together with his navigator in the T-4 for a total of 10 hours and 20 minutes, dispersed over ten occasions. Even though the T-4 was built to fly at Mach 3, it only made it to 1.3 and 12,000m of altitude before the program was cancelled. Four\u00a0Kolesov RD36-41 engines got it to Mach 1.3 (compared to 6 on the XB-70). Each of them - with afterburners - produced 157 kN of thrust. And even though they were built to take the aircraft to mach 3.0 they - as mentioned previously - never got the chance to prove themself as the program was cancelled in 1975. As the T-4 was seen as the SSSR competitor to the XB-70 Valkyrie, here are the specifications for both of them (although the T-4 was designed to have these specifications, it has not actually been proven that it featured all of them):<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n
Feature<\/td>\r\nSukhoi T-4<\/td>\r\nXB-70 Valkyrie<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Crew:<\/td>\r\n2<\/td>\r\n2<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Length:<\/td>\r\n44m<\/td>\r\n57.6m<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Wingspan:<\/td>\r\n22m<\/td>\r\n32m<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Wing area:<\/td>\r\n295.7m^2<\/td>\r\n585m^2<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Max speed:<\/td>\r\nMach 3.0<\/td>\r\nMach 3.1<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Max Service Ceiling:<\/td>\r\n24,000m<\/td>\r\n23,600m<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Empty weight:<\/td>\r\n55,600kg<\/td>\r\n115,030kg<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Loaded weight:<\/td>\r\n114,000kg<\/td>\r\n242,500kg<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<\/tbody>\r\n<\/table>\r\n

The Soviet T-4 - until the end<\/h1>\r\n

Even though the Americans retired their Valkyries in 1969, the Soviets continued to develop their T-4 and so had a complete flying prototype in 1971. Three more prototypes were started until 1975 when the project was scrapped on orders from MAI, the Moscow Aviation Institute. The last three prototypes were never finished. Some of the high-ranking officers of Soviet at the time were against the T-4 which was one of the reasons for its cancelling. It is said that Andrei Grechko (Minister of Defence) was told that \u201c You can have your enormous MiG-23<\/a> order only if the T-4 is abandoned\u201d. The different T-4s got to different stages in life. The 101 and 102 were built, the building of the 103 and 104 was started and the 105 and 106 only existed on the drawing board. The only aircraft who completed all flight tests was the 101 and was the only one that was saved after the project\u2019s cancellation - it can be seen at the famous Monino museum today.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n

\"\"

MiG-23, the aircraft which was chosen over the Su T-4<\/p><\/div>\r\n

Even though the XB-70 got to perform more tests than the T-100 and actually achieved mach 3.0 speed, both majestic bombers got to the drawing board at the wrong time. They were technically very advanced and innovative but nevertheless they were outmatched by anti-air missiles and outperformed by ICBMs. If they had come to the drawing board 10 or 20 years earlier there would probably not have been enough technology to build them, and 10 years later they would never have seen the light as neither the Soviet or the American Air Forces saw any use of them. But as with all airplanes (almost) they were something new and even though the T-4 is rather infamous compared to the Valkyrie, they will both always be remembered.<\/p>\r\n

Additional Reading:<\/strong><\/p>\r\n\r\n