{"id":30696032,"date":"2026-11-01T16:30:06","date_gmt":"2026-11-01T15:30:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/ultimate-load-test-static-test-wing-limit-load-boeing-airbus\/"},"modified":"2026-11-01T16:30:31","modified_gmt":"2026-11-01T15:30:31","slug":"ultimate-load-test-static-test-wing-limit-load-boeing-airbus","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/fr\/ultimate-load-test-static-test-wing-limit-load-boeing-airbus\/","title":{"rendered":"Ultimate Load Test: Why Boeing and Airbus Bend Wings to Breaking"},"content":{"rendered":"\r\n<style>.et_pb_title_container h1.entry-title { padding-top: 40px !important; }<\/style>\r\n\r\n\r\n<!-- mfsh:top -->\r\n\r\n<style>\r\n.mfsh-trigger{display:inline-flex;align-items:center;gap:10px;height:44px;padding:0 18px;margin:0 0 26px;border:2px solid #0F1720;background:#fff;color:#0F1720;font-family:inherit;font-size:14px;font-weight:700;line-height:1;letter-spacing:0;text-transform:none;cursor:pointer;box-shadow:none;transition:background .15s,color .15s}\r\n.mfsh-trigger:hover,.mfsh-trigger:focus-visible{background:#0F1720;color:#fff;outline:none}\r\n.mfsh-trigger svg{width:18px;height:18px;display:block;flex-shrink:0}\r\n.mfsh-trigger.mfsh-bottom{margin:8px 0 28px}\r\n.mfsh-meta{position:relative;padding-right:190px}\r\n.mfsh-trigger.mfsh-inmeta{position:absolute;right:0;bottom:0;margin:0;height:30px;padding:0 8.9px;font-size:13px}\r\n.mfsh-trigger.mfsh-inmeta svg{width:16px;height:16px}\r\n.mfsh-overlay{position:fixed;inset:0;background:rgba(15,23,32,.55);z-index:99999;display:flex;align-items:flex-end;justify-content:center;opacity:0;pointer-events:none;transition:opacity .2s}\r\n.mfsh-overlay.mfsh-open{opacity:1;pointer-events:auto}\r\n.mfsh-sheet{width:100%;max-width:520px;background:#fff;color:#0F1720;padding:18px 20px 28px;transform:translateY(24px);transition:transform .22s;box-shadow:0 12px 32px rgba(15,23,32,.25);font-family:inherit;max-height:92vh;overflow:auto;-webkit-overflow-scrolling:touch}\r\n.mfsh-overlay.mfsh-open .mfsh-sheet{transform:none}\r\n@media (min-width:640px){.mfsh-overlay{align-items:center}.mfsh-sheet{padding-bottom:20px}}\r\n.mfsh-head{display:flex;align-items:center;justify-content:space-between;margin:0 0 14px}\r\n.mfsh-head strong{font-size:18px;font-weight:800;display:flex;align-items:center;gap:8px;line-height:1}\r\n.mfsh-head strong svg{width:18px;height:18px}\r\n.mfsh-close{background:none;border:0;padding:6px;margin:0;cursor:pointer;color:#0F1720;line-height:0;box-shadow:none}\r\n.mfsh-close svg{width:18px;height:18px}\r\n.mfsh-preview{display:grid;grid-template-columns:96px 1fr;gap:12px;border:1px solid #DCE3EE;background:#F5F7FB;padding:10px;margin:0 0 12px;align-items:center}\r\n.mfsh-preview img{width:96px;height:72px;object-fit:cover;display:block;margin:0}\r\n.mfsh-preview .mfsh-kicker{font-size:10px;font-weight:700;letter-spacing:.14em;text-transform:uppercase;color:#5C91FF;margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.2}\r\n.mfsh-preview .mfsh-title{font-size:14px;line-height:1.3;font-weight:700;margin:0;display:block}\r\n.mfsh-list{display:grid;margin:0;padding:0}\r\n.mfsh-item{display:flex;align-items:center;gap:14px;height:50px;width:100%;border:0;border-top:1px solid #DCE3EE;background:none;padding:0 4px;margin:0;text-align:left;font-family:inherit;font-size:15px;font-weight:600;color:#0F1720;cursor:pointer;box-shadow:none;letter-spacing:0;text-transform:none;line-height:1}\r\n.mfsh-item:hover,.mfsh-item:focus-visible{background:#F5F7FB;outline:none}\r\n.mfsh-item svg{width:20px;height:20px;color:#5C91FF;flex-shrink:0;display:block}\r\n.mfsh-item small{margin-left:auto;color:#5B6674;font-weight:500;font-size:12px}\r\n.mfsh-item.mfsh-done svg{color:#1E9E5A}\r\n.mfsh-toast{position:fixed;left:50%;bottom:32px;transform:translate(-50%,10px);background:#0F1720;color:#fff;padding:10px 16px;font-weight:700;font-size:13px;font-family:inherit;opacity:0;pointer-events:none;transition:opacity .2s,transform .2s;z-index:100000}\r\n.mfsh-toast.mfsh-show{opacity:1;transform:translate(-50%,0)}\r\n@media (prefers-reduced-motion:reduce){.mfsh-overlay,.mfsh-sheet,.mfsh-toast,.mfsh-trigger{transition:none}}\r\n<\/style>\r\n<svg width=\"0\" height=\"0\" style=\"position:absolute\" aria-hidden=\"true\">\r\n  <symbol id=\"mfsh-i-share\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\"><path fill=\"none\" stroke=\"currentColor\" stroke-width=\"1.9\" stroke-linecap=\"square\" d=\"M12 3v12M8 7l4-4 4 4M5 12v8h14v-8\"\/><\/symbol>\r\n  <symbol id=\"mfsh-i-close\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\"><path fill=\"none\" stroke=\"currentColor\" stroke-width=\"2\" stroke-linecap=\"square\" d=\"m5 5 14 14M19 5 5 19\"\/><\/symbol>\r\n  <symbol id=\"mfsh-i-wa\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\"><path fill=\"currentColor\" d=\"M12 2a10 10 0 0 0-8.6 15.1L2 22l5.1-1.3A10 10 0 1 0 12 2Zm0 1.8a8.2 8.2 0 1 1-4.2 15.3l-.3-.2-3 .8.8-2.9-.2-.3A8.2 8.2 0 0 1 12 3.8Zm-3 4.4c-.2 0-.5 0-.8.4-.3.3-1 1-1 2.4s1 2.8 1.2 3c.1.2 2 3.2 5 4.4 2.5 1 3 .8 3.5.7.5 0 1.7-.7 2-1.4.2-.7.2-1.3.1-1.4l-.5-.3-2-1c-.3 0-.5-.1-.7.2l-.9 1.1c-.2.2-.3.2-.6.1-.3-.2-1.3-.5-2.4-1.5-.9-.8-1.5-1.8-1.7-2-.2-.4 0-.5.2-.7l.4-.5.3-.5v-.5l-.9-2.2c-.2-.5-.4-.5-.6-.5H9Z\"\/><\/symbol>\r\n  <symbol id=\"mfsh-i-x\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\"><path fill=\"currentColor\" d=\"M17.8 3h3l-6.7 7.7L22 21h-6.2l-4.8-6.3L5.4 21h-3l7.2-8.2L2 3h6.3l4.4 5.8L17.8 3Zm-1.1 16.2h1.7L7.4 4.7H5.6l11.1 14.5Z\"\/><\/symbol>\r\n  <symbol id=\"mfsh-i-fb\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\"><path fill=\"currentColor\" d=\"M13.5 22v-8h2.7l.4-3.2h-3.1V8.8c0-.9.3-1.6 1.6-1.6h1.7V4.4c-.3 0-1.3-.1-2.5-.1-2.5 0-4.1 1.5-4.1 4.2v2.3H7.4V14h2.8v8h3.3Z\"\/><\/symbol>\r\n  <symbol id=\"mfsh-i-li\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\"><path fill=\"currentColor\" d=\"M6.5 8.5H3V21h3.5V8.5ZM4.8 3a2 2 0 1 0 0 4 2 2 0 0 0 0-4ZM21 13.4c0-3.4-1.8-5.2-4.5-5.2-1.6 0-2.7.8-3.2 1.7V8.5H9.9V21h3.4v-6.4c0-1.7.6-2.8 2.1-2.8 1.4 0 2 1 2 2.8V21H21v-7.6Z\"\/><\/symbol>\r\n  <symbol id=\"mfsh-i-rd\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\"><path fill=\"currentColor\" d=\"M22 12.1a2.4 2.4 0 0 0-4.1-1.7 11.7 11.7 0 0 0-5.5-1.7l1-4.5 3.1.7a1.7 1.7 0 1 0 .2-1l-3.6-.8a.5.5 0 0 0-.6.4l-1.1 5.2a11.8 11.8 0 0 0-5.8 1.7A2.4 2.4 0 1 0 3 14.3v.5c0 3.4 4 6.2 9 6.2s9-2.8 9-6.2v-.5a2.4 2.4 0 0 0 1-2.2ZM7.5 13.8a1.7 1.7 0 1 1 3.4 0 1.7 1.7 0 0 1-3.4 0Zm8.9 4.5c-1.2 1.2-3.4 1.3-4.4 1.3s-3.3-.1-4.4-1.3a.5.5 0 0 1 .7-.7c.7.8 2.4 1 3.7 1s2.9-.2 3.7-1a.5.5 0 0 1 .7.7Zm-.6-2.8a1.7 1.7 0 1 1 0-3.4 1.7 1.7 0 0 1 0 3.4Z\"\/><\/symbol>\r\n  <symbol id=\"mfsh-i-tg\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\"><path fill=\"currentColor\" d=\"M21.9 4.6 18.7 19.9c-.2 1-.9 1.3-1.7.8l-4.9-3.6-2.3 2.3c-.3.3-.5.5-1 .5l.4-5 9-8.2c.4-.3-.1-.5-.6-.2L6.4 13.5 1.6 12c-1-.3-1.1-1 .2-1.5l18.8-7.2c.9-.3 1.6.2 1.3 1.3Z\"\/><\/symbol>\r\n  <symbol id=\"mfsh-i-mail\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\"><path fill=\"none\" stroke=\"currentColor\" stroke-width=\"1.8\" d=\"M3 6h18v12H3z\"\/><path fill=\"none\" stroke=\"currentColor\" stroke-width=\"1.8\" d=\"m3 7 9 6 9-6\"\/><\/symbol>\r\n  <symbol id=\"mfsh-i-link\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\"><path fill=\"none\" stroke=\"currentColor\" stroke-width=\"1.9\" stroke-linecap=\"square\" d=\"M10 14a4 4 0 0 0 5.7 0l3-3a4 4 0 0 0-5.7-5.7l-1.5 1.5M14 10a4 4 0 0 0-5.7 0l-3 3a4 4 0 0 0 5.7 5.7l1.5-1.5\"\/><\/symbol>\r\n  <symbol id=\"mfsh-i-more\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\"><circle cx=\"5\" cy=\"12\" r=\"2\" fill=\"currentColor\"\/><circle cx=\"12\" cy=\"12\" r=\"2\" fill=\"currentColor\"\/><circle cx=\"19\" cy=\"12\" r=\"2\" fill=\"currentColor\"\/><\/symbol>\r\n<\/svg>\r\n<span class=\"mfsh-top-slot\"><button type=\"button\" class=\"mfsh-trigger\" data-mfsh-placement=\"top\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\"><svg><use href=\"#mfsh-i-share\"\/><\/svg>Share this story<\/button><\/span>\r\n<script>\r\n(function(){\r\n  if (window.__mfsh) return; window.__mfsh = true;\r\n  var SECTION = 'afterburner';\r\n  function meta(p){ var m=document.querySelector('meta[property=\"'+p+'\"]'); return m ? m.getAttribute('content') : ''; }\r\n  function pageUrl(){ var c=document.querySelector('link[rel=\"canonical\"]'); return (c && c.href) || (location.origin + location.pathname); }\r\n  function pageTitle(){ var h=document.querySelector('h1.entry-title'); return (h && h.textContent.trim()) || meta('og:title') || document.title; }\r\n  function slug(){ return location.pathname.replace(\/\\\/+$\/,'').split('\/').pop() || 'home'; }\r\n  function kicker(){ var c=document.querySelector('.et_pb_title_container a[rel=\"category tag\"], .et_pb_title_container a[rel=\"category\"], a[rel=\"category tag\"]'); return 'Afterburner' + (c && c.textContent.trim() ? ' \u00b7 ' + c.textContent.trim() : ''); }\r\n  function shareUrl(ch, placement){ return pageUrl() + '?utm_source=share&utm_medium=' + ch + '&utm_campaign=' + SECTION + '&utm_content=sheet_' + placement; }\r\n  function track(ch, placement, extra){\r\n    window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || [];\r\n    var ev = { event:'share', share_channel:ch, share_variant:'sheet', share_placement:placement, page_section:SECTION, content_id:slug() };\r\n    if (extra) for (var k in extra) ev[k]=extra[k];\r\n    window.dataLayer.push(ev);\r\n  }\r\n  var CH = [\r\n    ['whatsapp','WhatsApp','mfsh-i-wa',''],\r\n    ['x','X','mfsh-i-x',''],\r\n    ['facebook','Facebook','mfsh-i-fb',''],\r\n    ['linkedin','LinkedIn','mfsh-i-li',''],\r\n    ['reddit','Reddit','mfsh-i-rd','r\/aviation, r\/WarplanePorn'],\r\n    ['telegram','Telegram','mfsh-i-tg',''],\r\n    ['email','Email','mfsh-i-mail',''],\r\n    ['copy','Copy link','mfsh-i-link',''],\r\n    ['native','More','mfsh-i-more','Instagram, Signal, AirDrop']\r\n  ];\r\n  var overlay, toastEl, toastT, placement = 'top';\r\n  function build(){\r\n    overlay = document.createElement('div'); overlay.className = 'mfsh-overlay'; overlay.setAttribute('role','dialog'); overlay.setAttribute('aria-modal','true'); overlay.setAttribute('aria-label','Share');\r\n    var img = meta('og:image');\r\n    var items = CH.filter(function(c){ return c[0] !== 'native' || !!navigator.share; }).map(function(c){\r\n      return '<button type=\"button\" class=\"mfsh-item\" data-mfsh-ch=\"'+c[0]+'\"><svg><use href=\"#'+c[2]+'\"\/><\/svg>'+c[1]+(c[3]?'<small>'+c[3]+'<\/small>':'')+'<\/button>';\r\n    }).join('');\r\n    overlay.innerHTML = '<div class=\"mfsh-sheet\"><div class=\"mfsh-head\"><strong><svg><use href=\"#mfsh-i-share\"\/><\/svg>Share<\/strong><button type=\"button\" class=\"mfsh-close\" aria-label=\"Close\"><svg><use href=\"#mfsh-i-close\"\/><\/svg><\/button><\/div>'\r\n      + '<div class=\"mfsh-preview\">' + (img ? '<img decoding=\"async\" class=\"skip-lazy\" data-no-lazy=\"1\" loading=\"eager\" src=\"'+img+'\" alt=\"\">' : '<span><\/span>') + '<div><div class=\"mfsh-kicker\">'+kicker()+'<\/div><span class=\"mfsh-title\">'+pageTitle()+'<\/span><\/div><\/div>'\r\n      + '<div class=\"mfsh-list\">'+items+'<\/div><\/div>';\r\n    document.body.appendChild(overlay);\r\n    toastEl = document.createElement('div'); toastEl.className = 'mfsh-toast'; document.body.appendChild(toastEl);\r\n    overlay.addEventListener('click', function(e){\r\n      if (e.target === overlay || e.target.closest('.mfsh-close')) { close(); return; }\r\n      var b = e.target.closest('.mfsh-item'); if (b) act(b.getAttribute('data-mfsh-ch'), b);\r\n    });\r\n    document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e){ if (e.key === 'Escape') close(); });\r\n  }\r\n  function open(p){ placement = p || 'top'; if (!overlay) build(); overlay.classList.add('mfsh-open'); track('open', placement); }\r\n  function close(){ if (overlay) overlay.classList.remove('mfsh-open'); }\r\n  function toast(m){ toastEl.textContent = m; toastEl.classList.add('mfsh-show'); clearTimeout(toastT); toastT = setTimeout(function(){ toastEl.classList.remove('mfsh-show'); }, 1600); }\r\n  function act(ch, btn){\r\n    var url = shareUrl(ch, placement), t = pageTitle(), enc = encodeURIComponent;\r\n    if (ch === 'copy') {\r\n      var done = function(){ toast('Link copied'); btn.classList.add('mfsh-done'); setTimeout(function(){ btn.classList.remove('mfsh-done'); close(); }, 900); };\r\n      track(ch, placement);\r\n      if (navigator.clipboard && navigator.clipboard.writeText) navigator.clipboard.writeText(url).then(done, done); else done();\r\n      return;\r\n    }\r\n    if (ch === 'native') {\r\n      track(ch, placement, { share_result:'opened' });\r\n      navigator.share({ title:t, text:t, url:url }).then(function(){ track('native', placement, { share_result:'completed' }); close(); }).catch(function(){});\r\n      return;\r\n    }\r\n    var target = {\r\n      whatsapp: 'https:\/\/api.whatsapp.com\/send?text=' + enc(t + ' ' + url),\r\n      x:        'https:\/\/twitter.com\/intent\/tweet?text=' + enc(t) + '&url=' + enc(url) + '&via=MiGFlug',\r\n      facebook: 'https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/sharer\/sharer.php?u=' + enc(url),\r\n      linkedin: 'https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/sharing\/share-offsite\/?url=' + enc(url),\r\n      reddit:   'https:\/\/www.reddit.com\/submit?url=' + enc(url) + '&title=' + enc(t),\r\n      telegram: 'https:\/\/t.me\/share\/url?url=' + enc(url) + '&text=' + enc(t),\r\n      email:    'mailto:?subject=' + enc(t) + '&body=' + enc('Thought you would like this, from Afterburner, MiGFlug\\'s magazine:\\n' + t + '\\n' + url)\r\n    }[ch];\r\n    track(ch, placement);\r\n    if (target) { if (ch === 'email') location.href = target; else window.open(target, '_blank', 'noopener,width=680,height=560'); }\r\n    close();\r\n  }\r\n  var mq = window.matchMedia('(min-width:981px)');\r\n  function place(){\r\n    var t = document.querySelector('.mfsh-trigger[data-mfsh-placement=\"top\"]'), slot = document.querySelector('.mfsh-top-slot');\r\n    var meta = [].slice.call(document.querySelectorAll('.et_pb_title_meta_container, .et_post_meta_wrapper .post-meta, .single .post-meta')).filter(function(m){ return m.offsetParent !== null; })[0];\r\n    if (!t || !slot) return;\r\n    if (meta && mq.matches) { meta.classList.add('mfsh-meta'); t.classList.add('mfsh-inmeta'); if (t.parentNode !== meta) meta.appendChild(t); var a = meta.querySelector('a'); if (a) { var pr = document.createElement('span'); pr.style.cssText = 'display:inline-block;width:0;height:0;vertical-align:baseline'; a.appendChild(pr); var base = pr.getBoundingClientRect().bottom; pr.remove(); var fs = parseFloat(getComputedStyle(a).fontSize) || 14, mb = meta.getBoundingClientRect().bottom; t.style.bottom = Math.max(0, mb - (base + fs * 0.12)) + 'px'; } }\r\n    else { t.classList.remove('mfsh-inmeta'); if (t.parentNode !== slot) slot.appendChild(t); }\r\n  }\r\n  if (document.readyState === 'loading') document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded', place); else place(); window.addEventListener('load', place); if (document.fonts && document.fonts.ready) document.fonts.ready.then(place); window.addEventListener('resize', place);\r\n  if (mq.addEventListener) mq.addEventListener('change', place); else mq.addListener(place);\r\n  document.addEventListener('click', function(e){ var b = e.target.closest('.mfsh-trigger'); if (b) { e.preventDefault(); open(b.getAttribute('data-mfsh-placement') || 'top'); } });\r\n})();\r\n<\/script><!-- \/mfsh:top -->\r\n\r\n<p>You have seen the video. A wing, stripped of its skin panels in places and bristling with instrumentation, is pulled upward by a forest of hydraulic jacks until the tips are somewhere near the roof. A number climbs on a screen. Then there is a bang like a shipping container being dropped, and twenty tonnes of aluminium stops being a wing.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<p>Almost everyone who watches that clip draws the same conclusion: this is what certification looks like, and the wing has to break for the aeroplane to be approved. It is a reasonable conclusion. It is also wrong, and the regulation that governs the test says so in two short paragraphs.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<p>What the rules actually demand is far stranger than destruction. They demand that the structure survive a load it will never see, by a margin fixed in 1970, for exactly three seconds.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n<div style=\"background:#f5f6f8;border-left:4px solid #5C91FF;padding:18px 22px;margin:26px 0 28px;font-size:15.5px;line-height:1.75\"><p style=\"margin:0 0 10px;font-weight:700;font-size:17px;color:#0d1117\">Quick Facts: the static test to ultimate load<\/p><p style=\"margin:3px 0\"><strong>Limit load:<\/strong> the greatest load expected in service. 14 CFR 25.305(a): the structure must support it without detrimental permanent deformation<\/p><p style=\"margin:3px 0\"><strong>The factor of safety:<\/strong> 1.5, applied to limit load, under 14 CFR 25.303<\/p><p style=\"margin:3px 0\"><strong>Ultimate load:<\/strong> 150 per cent of limit load. 14 CFR 25.305(b): supported without failure for at least three seconds<\/p><p style=\"margin:3px 0\"><strong>The three-second rule:<\/strong> waived where proof of strength comes from dynamic tests simulating actual load conditions<\/p><p style=\"margin:3px 0\"><strong>Boeing 787:<\/strong> ultimate-load wing up-bending test completed 28 March 2010, wingtips raised about 25 feet<\/p><p style=\"margin:3px 0\"><strong>Airbus A350 XWB:<\/strong> static airframe taken to 1.5 times limit load in December 2013, wingtips deflecting more than five metres<\/p><p style=\"margin:3px 0\"><strong>Boeing 777-9:<\/strong> failed on 5 September 2019 at 1.48 times limit load, one per cent short of the target<\/p><p style=\"margin:3px 0\"><strong>What the rule does not say:<\/strong> nothing in Part 25 requires the structure to be destroyed<\/p><\/div>\r\n\r\n\r\n<h2 style=\"padding-top:22px\">Limit load is the worst day the aeroplane is ever supposed to have<\/h2>\r\n\r\n<p>Start with the number that everything else is built on. Limit load is the maximum load the designers expect the aircraft to meet in service &mdash; the gust that arrives at the wrong moment, the manoeuvre at the corner of the envelope, the landing nobody is proud of. Subpart C of 14 CFR Part 25 spends several thousand words defining the flight and ground conditions that generate it.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<p>What the structure owes at that load is set out in 25.305(a), and it is a subtler requirement than it first appears: the structure must be able to support limit loads without detrimental permanent deformation, and at any load up to limit load, the deformation may not interfere with safe operation.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<p>Read that second clause again. The wing is allowed to bend &mdash; enormously, as any window-seat passenger in turbulence knows. What it is not allowed to do is bend in a way that jams a control surface, binds a fuel line or leaves the aeroplane a different shape afterwards. Limit load is the boundary of the elastic world. Below it, the structure springs back.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<h2 style=\"padding-top:22px\">Then you multiply by one and a half<\/h2>\r\n\r\n<p>Above limit load sits a second number, and the rule that creates it is one of the shortest in Part 25.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n<div style=\"background:#f8f9fa;border-left:4px solid #5C91FF;padding:20px 22px;margin:18px 0 24px;font-size:16px;line-height:1.7\"><div><em>&ldquo;Unless otherwise specified, a factor of safety of 1.5 must be applied to the prescribed limit load which are considered external loads on the structure.&rdquo;<\/em><div style=\"margin-top:10px;font-size:14px;color:#555\"><strong>14 CFR 25.303<\/strong> &mdash; Factor of safety, as amended by Amendment 25-23, 8 April 1970<\/div><\/div><\/div>\r\n\r\n\r\n<p>That is ultimate load: limit load times 1.5, a margin that has survived essentially unchanged for over half a century. It is not a prediction of anything. No airliner is expected to encounter 150 per cent of its own worst case. The factor exists to absorb everything the analysis cannot see &mdash; scatter in material properties, a batch of fasteners at the low end of tolerance, a manufacturing deviation, a load case nobody thought to run.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\" style=\"margin:0 0 24px;width:100%\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"skip-lazy\" data-no-lazy=\"1\" loading=\"eager\" width=\"1024\" src=\"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2026\/11\/limit-load-ultimate-load-150-percent-three-seconds-diagram-scaled.png\" alt=\"Diagram of the structural load scale from limit load at 100 per cent to ultimate load at 150 per cent, with three airliner static test campaigns\" style=\"width:100%;height:auto;max-width:100%;display:block\"><figcaption style=\"font-size:13px;color:#777;text-align:center;margin-top:6px;font-style:italic\">The ladder the whole test climbs. Below 100 per cent nothing may deform permanently; at 150 per cent nothing may break for three seconds. Where each campaign stopped is the interesting part.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\r\n\r\n\r\n<p>And what the structure owes at ultimate load is stated in a sentence that is quoted far less often than it deserves:<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n<div style=\"background:#f8f9fa;border-left:4px solid #5C91FF;padding:20px 22px;margin:18px 0 24px;font-size:16px;line-height:1.7\"><div><em>&ldquo;The structure must be able to support ultimate loads without failure for at least 3 seconds. However, when proof of strength is shown by dynamic tests simulating actual load conditions, the 3-second limit does not apply. Static tests conducted to ultimate load must include the ultimate deflections and ultimate deformation induced by the loading.&rdquo;<\/em><div style=\"margin-top:10px;font-size:14px;color:#555\"><strong>14 CFR 25.305(b)<\/strong> &mdash; Strength and deformation, Part 25 Subpart C<\/div><\/div><\/div>\r\n\r\n\r\n<p>Three seconds. That is the entire demand. Hold the number, do not come apart, and the requirement is met. There is no clause instructing anybody to keep pulling until something lets go.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<p>The three seconds themselves are not arbitrary. A static rig applies load slowly, over minutes, while the real event that produces limit load &mdash; a gust, a manoeuvre &mdash; is over in a fraction of a second. The hold is there to prove the structure is genuinely in equilibrium at that load rather than passing through it, which is also why the rule drops the requirement when the proof comes from dynamic testing that reproduces the real load history instead.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<p>The companion rule, 25.307, explains why anybody builds a rig at all. Structural analysis alone may be used only if the structure conforms to one for which experience has shown the method reliable. In every other case, the regulation says, substantiating tests must be made to load levels sufficient to verify structural behaviour up to the loads specified in 25.305. On a clean-sheet wing in a new material, that is the whole wing.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<h2 style=\"padding-top:22px\">What actually happened on the three big rigs<\/h2>\r\n\r\n<p>Theory is cheap. The interesting part is where each manufacturer chose to stop.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<p><strong>Boeing 787, 28 March 2010.<\/strong> Boeing announced that it had completed the ultimate-load wing up-bending test on the 787 static test unit, loading the airframe to 150 per cent of the most extreme forces the aeroplane is ever expected to experience in service. The wings flexed upward by roughly 25 feet. The programme did not declare victory on the spot; Boeing described the initial results as positive and said more extensive analysis and review were needed before the test could be deemed a success. That gap between the hold and the verdict is normal, and it is where the strain-gauge data earns its keep.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n<div style=\"background:#f8f9fa;border-left:4px solid #5C91FF;padding:20px 22px;margin:18px 0 24px;font-size:16px;line-height:1.7\"><div><em>&ldquo;The test program has been more robust than any conducted on a Boeing commercial jetliner.&rdquo;<\/em><div style=\"margin-top:10px;font-size:14px;color:#555\"><strong>Scott Fancher<\/strong> &mdash; Vice president and general manager, 787 programme, Boeing Commercial Airplanes, 28 March 2010<\/div><\/div><\/div>\r\n\r\n\r\n<p><strong>Airbus A350 XWB, December 2013.<\/strong> Airbus took its static test airframe to 1.5 times limit load, with the wingtips deflecting more than five metres at the peak. The company announced the result in January 2014 as a pass. It did not take the structure to destruction, and nothing in the regulation asked it to.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n<div style=\"max-width:550px;margin:0 auto 28px\"><iframe class=\"skip-lazy\" data-no-lazy=\"1\" loading=\"eager\" src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/embed\/Tweet.html?id=422758414230355968&theme=light\" style=\"width:100%;height:400px;border:none;overflow:hidden\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/div>\r\n\r\n\r\n<p>Two sentences and a photograph, which is roughly the proportion of public attention this milestone usually gets relative to a first flight. Inside the company it is the bigger moment of the two.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\" style=\"margin:0 0 24px;width:100%\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"skip-lazy\" data-no-lazy=\"1\" loading=\"eager\" width=\"1024\" src=\"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2026\/11\/nasa-active-aeroelastic-wing-f-18-structural-loads-testing-dryden-scaled.jpg\" alt=\"An F-18 seen from above with wing panels removed, instrumented for structural loads testing at NASA Dryden\" style=\"width:100%;height:auto;max-width:100%;display:block\"><figcaption style=\"font-size:13px;color:#777;text-align:center;margin-top:6px;font-style:italic\">Structural loads testing on the Active Aeroelastic Wing <a href=\"https:\/\/migflug.com\/aircraft\/fa-18-hornet\/\">F-18<\/a> in the Flight Loads Laboratory at NASA&rsquo;s Dryden Flight Research Center. The access panels come off so strain gauges can be read directly off the structure. (NASA \/ Tom Tschida)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\r\n\r\n\r\n<p><strong>Boeing 777-9, 5 September 2019.<\/strong> This is the one that went wrong, and it went wrong by the narrowest margin in the business. With FAA personnel present, the static article was being loaded toward ultimate when the structure failed at 1.48 times limit load &mdash; 99 per cent of the target. The initiating failure was in the lower fuselage behind the wing, where compression buckled and ruptured the aluminium skin; the split ran up the side and a passenger plug door aft of the wing blew out, a secondary effect rather than the cause. The airframe was a write-off and was scrapped.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<p>Boeing said at the time that what it had seen reinforced its prior assessment and that the result would not have a significant impact on the design or on preparations for first flight. One per cent short is still short, and the regulation does not round up. But as an illustration of how finely these margins are cut, nothing in modern certification beats it: the difference between a pass and a scrapped airframe was two per cent of limit load.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n<div style=\"position:relative;padding-bottom:56.25%;height:0;overflow:hidden;margin:24px 0\"><iframe class=\"skip-lazy\" data-no-lazy=\"1\" loading=\"eager\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/ZQQSW8a-vXY\" style=\"position:absolute;top:0;left:0;width:100%;height:100%;border:0\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/div>\r\n\r\n\r\n<p>Boeing&rsquo;s own film on how the 777X wing spars are tested is a rare look inside the process from the manufacturer&rsquo;s side rather than from a phone camera at the back of the hall.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<h2 style=\"padding-top:22px\">So why does the famous video end with a bang?<\/h2>\r\n\r\n<p>Because somebody chose to keep pulling.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<p>The clip most people have seen is the Boeing 777 wing test from January 1995. Aviation Week reported it at the end of that month under the headline &ldquo;777 passes full-scale wing destruct test&rdquo;, noting that the tests confirmed the wing met its maximum design requirement of bearing 150 per cent of the load experienced in the most extreme flight conditions. Boeing&rsquo;s own image archive dates the ultimate load test of the 777 wing to 1995 as well.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n<div style=\"position:relative;padding-bottom:56.25%;height:0;overflow:hidden;margin:24px 0\"><iframe class=\"skip-lazy\" data-no-lazy=\"1\" loading=\"eager\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/K2QoanZq2jE\" style=\"position:absolute;top:0;left:0;width:100%;height:100%;border:0\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/div>\r\n\r\n\r\n<p>A word of caution about the number that always travels with this footage. You will see it stated everywhere that the 777 wing broke at exactly 154 per cent of limit load. That figure is repeated in forum posts, in video captions and on social media, and we could not trace it to a primary Boeing or FAA document. The contemporaneous trade reporting confirms the wing met the 150 per cent requirement; the extra four points appear to have entered circulation somewhere downstream. Treat it as folklore that may well be true rather than as a specification.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<p>What the clip genuinely shows is a decision, not a requirement. Once a structure has held ultimate load for its three seconds, the regulatory job is finished and the test article is, in engineering terms, scrap. Continuing to load it costs nothing further and buys information that exists nowhere else: the actual margin, measured rather than calculated.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n<div style=\"position:relative;padding-bottom:56.25%;height:0;overflow:hidden;margin:24px 0\"><iframe class=\"skip-lazy\" data-no-lazy=\"1\" loading=\"eager\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/m5GD3E2onlk\" style=\"position:absolute;top:0;left:0;width:100%;height:100%;border:0\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/div>\r\n\r\n\r\n<p>The 787 test is the cleaner demonstration of the elastic story. Watch how far the tips travel and how completely the wing returns.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<h2 style=\"padding-top:22px\">Why the engineers want it to fail close to the line<\/h2>\r\n\r\n<p>Here is the counterintuitive part, and it is the reason the breaking point matters even though no rule requires one.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<p>If a wing is taken past ultimate and fails just above 150 per cent, the structure is very nearly perfectly sized. The analysis was right, the margins were thin and honest, and almost nothing is being carried that does not need to be there. If it survives to a long way above ultimate, that is not a triumph &mdash; it is excess material, and excess material on a wing is weight. Weight is fuel, fuel is payload and range, and over a twenty-five-year service life across a fleet of several hundred aircraft, a few hundred surplus kilograms per airframe is a real number on somebody&rsquo;s balance sheet.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<p>This is also why 25.307 insists on material correction factors when static or dynamic tests are used to show compliance, unless the structure has enough redundancy that the failure of one element simply redistributes load through alternate paths. The test article is one specimen built from one set of batches. The fleet is not. The correction factor is the bridge between the thing on the rig and the thousand aircraft that will be built to the same drawings.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<p>So the next time the clip comes around your feed, watch it for what it is. Not a trial by ordeal, and not a requirement to destroy. A structure holding a number it will never meet, for three seconds, while a room full of people read strain gauges &mdash; and then, because the airframe has no future anyway, an engineering team spending the remains on finding out exactly how good their sums were.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<p><em>Sources: 14 CFR 25.301, 25.303, 25.305 and 25.307 (eCFR, current as of October 2026); Boeing media release, &ldquo;Boeing Completes Ultimate-Load Wing Test on 787&rdquo;, 28 March 2010; Aviation Week, &ldquo;A350 XWB passes ultimate load wing test&rdquo;, 13 January 2014; Airbus, 13 January 2014; Aviation Week, &ldquo;777 passes full-scale wing destruct test&rdquo;, 30 January 1995; The Seattle Times and AVweb reporting on the 777X static test failure, November 2019; NASA Armstrong Flight Research Center.<\/em><\/p>\r\n\r\n<!-- mfsh:bottom -->\r\n\r\n<button type=\"button\" class=\"mfsh-trigger mfsh-bottom\" data-mfsh-placement=\"bottom\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\"><svg><use href=\"#mfsh-i-share\"\/><\/svg>Share this story<\/button>\r\n\r\n<!-- \/mfsh:bottom -->\r\n\r\n\r\n<style>.mfq{margin:34px 0 8px}.mfq h2{font:26px\/1.3 \"Gilroy semiBold\",Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;color:#0d1117;padding-top:22px;margin:0 0 6px}.mfq .qa details{border-top:1px solid #5C91FF;margin:0;padding:0}.mfq .qa details:last-of-type{border-bottom:1px solid #e2e7ee}.mfq .qa summary{cursor:pointer;list-style:none;display:flex;justify-content:space-between;align-items:center;gap:16px;padding:22px 26px;font:18px\/1.7 \"Gilroy semiBold\",Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;color:#0d1117}.mfq .qa summary::-webkit-details-marker{display:none}.mfq .qa summary::after{content:\"+\";font:24px Helvetica,sans-serif;color:#3568e0;flex:0 0 auto}.mfq .qa details[open] summary::after{content:\"\\2013\"}.mfq .qa details:hover summary{color:#3568e0}.mfq .qa .a{font:16px\/1.7 \"Gilroy regular\",Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;color:#454e5e;padding:0 26px 24px}.mfq .qa .a a{color:#3568e0}@media(max-width:680px){.mfq .qa summary{padding:18px 14px;font-size:17px}.mfq .qa .a{padding:0 14px 20px}}<\/style>\r\n\r\n\r\n<section class=\"mfq\"><h2>Frequently Asked Questions<\/h2><div class=\"qa\"><details open><summary>What is an ultimate load test?<\/summary><div class=\"a\">It is the structural test that proves an airframe can carry 150 per cent of its limit load. Under 14 CFR 25.305(b) the structure must support ultimate loads without failure for at least three seconds. The test is run on a dedicated static test airframe in a rig of hydraulic actuators, not on an aircraft that will ever fly.<\/div><\/details><details><summary>What is the difference between limit load and ultimate load?<\/summary><div class=\"a\">Limit load is the greatest load the aircraft is expected to meet in service, and under 14 CFR 25.305(a) the structure must carry it without detrimental permanent deformation. Ultimate load is limit load multiplied by the 1.5 factor of safety in 14 CFR 25.303. The structure may be permanently deformed at ultimate load, but it must not fail.<\/div><\/details><details><summary>Do aircraft wings have to be broken to be certified?<\/summary><div class=\"a\">No. Nothing in 14 CFR Part 25 requires the structure to be destroyed. The requirement is to support ultimate load without failure for at least three seconds. Manufacturers often continue loading past that point because the test article has no further use, and the actual breaking point is information they cannot get any other way.<\/div><\/details><details><summary>Why is the factor of safety for airliners 1.5?<\/summary><div class=\"a\">The 1.5 factor in 14 CFR 25.303 covers what the analysis cannot see: scatter in material properties, manufacturing tolerances, fasteners at the low end of specification, and load cases that were not anticipated. It is not a prediction that an aircraft will ever meet 150 per cent of its worst case, and it has been essentially unchanged since 1970.<\/div><\/details><details><summary>How far do airliner wingtips move in an ultimate load test?<\/summary><div class=\"a\">Boeing reported that the 787 wingtips flexed upward by roughly 25 feet during the ultimate-load wing up-bending test completed on 28 March 2010. Airbus reported that the A350 XWB wingtips deflected more than five metres at ultimate load during the static test campaign in December 2013.<\/div><\/details><details><summary>What happened during the Boeing 777X static test in 2019?<\/summary><div class=\"a\">On 5 September 2019 the 777-9 static test article failed at 1.48 times limit load, 99 per cent of the ultimate load target. The lower fuselage skin ruptured behind the wing and a passenger plug door blew out as a secondary effect. The airframe was scrapped. Boeing said the result would not significantly affect the design or preparations for first flight.<\/div><\/details><details><summary>Did the Boeing 777 wing really break at 154 per cent of limit load?<\/summary><div class=\"a\">The figure is widely repeated but difficult to source. Aviation Week reported in January 1995 that the full-scale test confirmed the wing met its design requirement of 150 per cent of the load experienced in the most extreme flight conditions. The additional four percentage points appear in forums and video captions rather than in any Boeing or FAA document we could trace.<\/div><\/details><details><summary>Why do engineers want the wing to fail only just above ultimate load?<\/summary><div class=\"a\">Because a structure that survives far beyond ultimate load is carrying material it does not need, and on a wing that material is weight. A failure just above 150 per cent means the analysis was accurate and the margins honest. Weight costs fuel, payload and range across every flight of a twenty-five-year service life.<\/div><\/details><\/div><\/section>\r\n\r\n\r\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@type\":\"FAQPage\",\"mainEntity\":[{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"name\":\"What is an ultimate load test?\",\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"It is the structural test that proves an airframe can carry 150 per cent of its limit load. Under 14 CFR 25.305(b) the structure must support ultimate loads without failure for at least three seconds. The test is run on a dedicated static test airframe in a rig of hydraulic actuators, not on an aircraft that will ever fly.\"}},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"name\":\"What is the difference between limit load and ultimate load?\",\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"Limit load is the greatest load the aircraft is expected to meet in service, and under 14 CFR 25.305(a) the structure must carry it without detrimental permanent deformation. Ultimate load is limit load multiplied by the 1.5 factor of safety in 14 CFR 25.303. The structure may be permanently deformed at ultimate load, but it must not fail.\"}},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"name\":\"Do aircraft wings have to be broken to be certified?\",\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"No. Nothing in 14 CFR Part 25 requires the structure to be destroyed. The requirement is to support ultimate load without failure for at least three seconds. Manufacturers often continue loading past that point because the test article has no further use, and the actual breaking point is information they cannot get any other way.\"}},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"name\":\"Why is the factor of safety for airliners 1.5?\",\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"The 1.5 factor in 14 CFR 25.303 covers what the analysis cannot see: scatter in material properties, manufacturing tolerances, fasteners at the low end of specification, and load cases that were not anticipated. It is not a prediction that an aircraft will ever meet 150 per cent of its worst case, and it has been essentially unchanged since 1970.\"}},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"name\":\"How far do airliner wingtips move in an ultimate load test?\",\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"Boeing reported that the 787 wingtips flexed upward by roughly 25 feet during the ultimate-load wing up-bending test completed on 28 March 2010. Airbus reported that the A350 XWB wingtips deflected more than five metres at ultimate load during the static test campaign in December 2013.\"}},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"name\":\"What happened during the Boeing 777X static test in 2019?\",\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"On 5 September 2019 the 777-9 static test article failed at 1.48 times limit load, 99 per cent of the ultimate load target. The lower fuselage skin ruptured behind the wing and a passenger plug door blew out as a secondary effect. The airframe was scrapped. Boeing said the result would not significantly affect the design or preparations for first flight.\"}},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"name\":\"Did the Boeing 777 wing really break at 154 per cent of limit load?\",\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"The figure is widely repeated but difficult to source. Aviation Week reported in January 1995 that the full-scale test confirmed the wing met its design requirement of 150 per cent of the load experienced in the most extreme flight conditions. The additional four percentage points appear in forums and video captions rather than in any Boeing or FAA document we could trace.\"}},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"name\":\"Why do engineers want the wing to fail only just above ultimate load?\",\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"Because a structure that survives far beyond ultimate load is carrying material it does not need, and on a wing that material is weight. A failure just above 150 per cent means the analysis was accurate and the margins honest. Weight costs fuel, payload and range across every flight of a twenty-five-year service life.\"}}]}<\/script><div style=\"background:#f0f4ff;border-left:4px solid #5C91FF;padding:16px 20px;margin:32px 0 8px\"><p style=\"margin:0 0 8px;font-weight:600;color:#333\">Related Posts<\/p><p style=\"margin:4px 0\"><a href=\"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/boeing-777x-wing-flex-folding-wingtips-explained\/\">Why the Boeing 777X&rsquo;s Wings Bend So Much &ndash; and Fold<\/a><\/p><p style=\"margin:4px 0\"><a href=\"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/american-airlines-flight-587-belle-harbor-a300-rudder-2001\/\">American Airlines Flight 587: The A300 Rudder and Belle Harbor<\/a><\/p><p style=\"margin:4px 0\"><a href=\"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/winglets-richard-whitcomb-nasa-wingtip-vortex-fuel-saving\/\">The Bent Wingtips That Save Billions in Fuel<\/a><\/p><p style=\"margin:4px 0\"><a href=\"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/service-ceiling-why-airliners-stop-climbing-41000-feet\/\">Service Ceiling: Why Airliners Stop Climbing at 41,000 Feet<\/a><\/p><\/div>\r\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The rule asks for 150 per cent of limit load, held for three seconds. It never asks anyone to break the wing. Inside the static tests of the 787, the A350 and the 777-9 that failed one per cent short.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":23,"featured_media":30694882,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"editor_notices":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[665],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-30696032","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-aviation-world"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v28.8 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Ultimate Load Test: How Airliner Wings Are Proved | MiGFlug<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The ultimate load test asks for 150 per cent of limit load, held three seconds. Inside the static tests of the Boeing 787, Airbus A350 and the 777-9 failure.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/fr\/ultimate-load-test-static-test-wing-limit-load-boeing-airbus\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"fr_FR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ultimate Load Test: How Airliner Wings Are Proved | MiGFlug\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The ultimate load test asks for 150 per cent of limit load, held three seconds. Inside the static tests of the Boeing 787, Airbus A350 and the 777-9 failure.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/fr\/ultimate-load-test-static-test-wing-limit-load-boeing-airbus\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Afterburner - MiGFlug&#039;s Magazine\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/MiGFlug\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-11-01T15:30:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-11-01T15:30:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2026\/11\/nasa-flight-loads-laboratory-wing-test-load-frame-featured.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1600\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"900\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Max Gr\u00fcnwald\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@migflug\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@migflug\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Max Gr\u00fcnwald\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"16 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/ultimate-load-test-static-test-wing-limit-load-boeing-airbus\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/ultimate-load-test-static-test-wing-limit-load-boeing-airbus\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Max Gr\u00fcnwald\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/it\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/da89e4a5834c9a932ee20751ed75569c\"},\"headline\":\"Ultimate Load Test: Why Boeing and Airbus Bend Wings to Breaking\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-11-01T15:30:06+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-11-01T15:30:31+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/ultimate-load-test-static-test-wing-limit-load-boeing-airbus\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":2577,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/it\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/ultimate-load-test-static-test-wing-limit-load-boeing-airbus\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/4\\\/2026\\\/11\\\/nasa-flight-loads-laboratory-wing-test-load-frame-featured.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Aviation World\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/ultimate-load-test-static-test-wing-limit-load-boeing-airbus\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/ultimate-load-test-static-test-wing-limit-load-boeing-airbus\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/ultimate-load-test-static-test-wing-limit-load-boeing-airbus\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ultimate Load Test: How Airliner Wings Are Proved | MiGFlug\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/it\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/ultimate-load-test-static-test-wing-limit-load-boeing-airbus\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/ultimate-load-test-static-test-wing-limit-load-boeing-airbus\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/4\\\/2026\\\/11\\\/nasa-flight-loads-laboratory-wing-test-load-frame-featured.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-11-01T15:30:06+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-11-01T15:30:31+00:00\",\"description\":\"The ultimate load test asks for 150 per cent of limit load, held three seconds. Inside the static tests of the Boeing 787, Airbus A350 and the 777-9 failure.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/ultimate-load-test-static-test-wing-limit-load-boeing-airbus\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/ultimate-load-test-static-test-wing-limit-load-boeing-airbus\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/ultimate-load-test-static-test-wing-limit-load-boeing-airbus\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/4\\\/2026\\\/11\\\/nasa-flight-loads-laboratory-wing-test-load-frame-featured.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/4\\\/2026\\\/11\\\/nasa-flight-loads-laboratory-wing-test-load-frame-featured.jpg\",\"width\":1600,\"height\":900,\"caption\":\"A wing test article held in a steel load frame surrounded by hydraulic actuators in a structural test laboratory\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/ultimate-load-test-static-test-wing-limit-load-boeing-airbus\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Startseite\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/it\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ultimate Load Test: Why Boeing and Airbus Bend Wings to Breaking\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/it\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/it\\\/\",\"name\":\"Afterburner - MiGFlug's Magazine\",\"description\":\"for those interested in flying military jets and aviation related  topics\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/it\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/it\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/it\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"MiGFlug GmbH\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/it\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/it\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ml5psubhxdln.i.optimole.com\\\/cb:0e0_.b970\\\/w:897\\\/h:278\\\/q:mauto\\\/ig:avif\\\/https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/4\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/MIGFLUG_LOGO-no-background.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ml5psubhxdln.i.optimole.com\\\/cb:0e0_.b970\\\/w:897\\\/h:278\\\/q:mauto\\\/ig:avif\\\/https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/4\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/MIGFLUG_LOGO-no-background.png\",\"width\":897,\"height\":278,\"caption\":\"MiGFlug GmbH\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/it\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/MiGFlug\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/migflug\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.instagram.com\\\/migflug\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/user\\\/MiGFlug\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/company\\\/migflug.com\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.pinterest.ch\\\/migflug\\\/\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/it\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/da89e4a5834c9a932ee20751ed75569c\",\"name\":\"Max Gr\u00fcnwald\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4a7af37924a5c24d0712babd0e5eafec09d37b3a41831dd4c4ee30f54ebfc1a7?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4a7af37924a5c24d0712babd0e5eafec09d37b3a41831dd4c4ee30f54ebfc1a7?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4a7af37924a5c24d0712babd0e5eafec09d37b3a41831dd4c4ee30f54ebfc1a7?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Max Gr\u00fcnwald\"},\"description\":\"Max Gr\u00fcnwald writes MiGFlug\u2019s technical deep-dives \u2014 engines, avionics and weapons systems, with every number checked twice.\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/fr\\\/author\\\/maxgruenwald\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ultimate Load Test: How Airliner Wings Are Proved | MiGFlug","description":"The ultimate load test asks for 150 per cent of limit load, held three seconds. Inside the static tests of the Boeing 787, Airbus A350 and the 777-9 failure.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/fr\/ultimate-load-test-static-test-wing-limit-load-boeing-airbus\/","og_locale":"fr_FR","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ultimate Load Test: How Airliner Wings Are Proved | MiGFlug","og_description":"The ultimate load test asks for 150 per cent of limit load, held three seconds. Inside the static tests of the Boeing 787, Airbus A350 and the 777-9 failure.","og_url":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/fr\/ultimate-load-test-static-test-wing-limit-load-boeing-airbus\/","og_site_name":"Afterburner - MiGFlug's Magazine","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/MiGFlug\/","article_published_time":"2026-11-01T15:30:06+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-11-01T15:30:31+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1600,"height":900,"url":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2026\/11\/nasa-flight-loads-laboratory-wing-test-load-frame-featured.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Max Gr\u00fcnwald","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@migflug","twitter_site":"@migflug","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Max Gr\u00fcnwald","Est. reading time":"16 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/ultimate-load-test-static-test-wing-limit-load-boeing-airbus\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/ultimate-load-test-static-test-wing-limit-load-boeing-airbus\/"},"author":{"name":"Max Gr\u00fcnwald","@id":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/it\/#\/schema\/person\/da89e4a5834c9a932ee20751ed75569c"},"headline":"Ultimate Load Test: Why Boeing and Airbus Bend Wings to Breaking","datePublished":"2026-11-01T15:30:06+00:00","dateModified":"2026-11-01T15:30:31+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/ultimate-load-test-static-test-wing-limit-load-boeing-airbus\/"},"wordCount":2577,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/it\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/ultimate-load-test-static-test-wing-limit-load-boeing-airbus\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2026\/11\/nasa-flight-loads-laboratory-wing-test-load-frame-featured.jpg","articleSection":["Aviation World"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/ultimate-load-test-static-test-wing-limit-load-boeing-airbus\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/ultimate-load-test-static-test-wing-limit-load-boeing-airbus\/","url":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/ultimate-load-test-static-test-wing-limit-load-boeing-airbus\/","name":"Ultimate Load Test: How Airliner Wings Are Proved | MiGFlug","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/it\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/ultimate-load-test-static-test-wing-limit-load-boeing-airbus\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/ultimate-load-test-static-test-wing-limit-load-boeing-airbus\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2026\/11\/nasa-flight-loads-laboratory-wing-test-load-frame-featured.jpg","datePublished":"2026-11-01T15:30:06+00:00","dateModified":"2026-11-01T15:30:31+00:00","description":"The ultimate load test asks for 150 per cent of limit load, held three seconds. Inside the static tests of the Boeing 787, Airbus A350 and the 777-9 failure.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/ultimate-load-test-static-test-wing-limit-load-boeing-airbus\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/ultimate-load-test-static-test-wing-limit-load-boeing-airbus\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/ultimate-load-test-static-test-wing-limit-load-boeing-airbus\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2026\/11\/nasa-flight-loads-laboratory-wing-test-load-frame-featured.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2026\/11\/nasa-flight-loads-laboratory-wing-test-load-frame-featured.jpg","width":1600,"height":900,"caption":"A wing test article held in a steel load frame surrounded by hydraulic actuators in a structural test laboratory"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/ultimate-load-test-static-test-wing-limit-load-boeing-airbus\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Startseite","item":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/it\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ultimate Load Test: Why Boeing and Airbus Bend Wings to Breaking"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/it\/#website","url":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/it\/","name":"Afterburner - Le magazine de MiGFlug","description":"pour ceux qui s&#039;int\u00e9ressent au pilotage d&#039;avions militaires et aux sujets li\u00e9s \u00e0 l&#039;aviation","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/it\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/it\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/it\/#organization","name":"MiGFlug GmbH","url":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/it\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/it\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/ml5psubhxdln.i.optimole.com\/cb:0e0_.b970\/w:897\/h:278\/q:mauto\/ig:avif\/https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2026\/06\/MIGFLUG_LOGO-no-background.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/ml5psubhxdln.i.optimole.com\/cb:0e0_.b970\/w:897\/h:278\/q:mauto\/ig:avif\/https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2026\/06\/MIGFLUG_LOGO-no-background.png","width":897,"height":278,"caption":"MiGFlug GmbH"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/it\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/MiGFlug\/","https:\/\/x.com\/migflug","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/migflug\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/MiGFlug","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/migflug.com\/","https:\/\/www.pinterest.ch\/migflug\/"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/it\/#\/schema\/person\/da89e4a5834c9a932ee20751ed75569c","name":"Max Gr\u00fcnwald","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4a7af37924a5c24d0712babd0e5eafec09d37b3a41831dd4c4ee30f54ebfc1a7?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4a7af37924a5c24d0712babd0e5eafec09d37b3a41831dd4c4ee30f54ebfc1a7?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4a7af37924a5c24d0712babd0e5eafec09d37b3a41831dd4c4ee30f54ebfc1a7?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Max Gr\u00fcnwald"},"description":"Max Gr\u00fcnwald r\u00e9dige les analyses techniques approfondies de MiGFlug \u2014 moteurs, avionique et syst\u00e8mes d&#039;armement \u2014 chaque chiffre \u00e9tant v\u00e9rifi\u00e9 deux fois.","url":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/fr\/author\/maxgruenwald\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30696032","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/23"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=30696032"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30696032\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":30696188,"href":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30696032\/revisions\/30696188"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/30694882"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=30696032"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=30696032"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=30696032"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}