{"id":24485971,"date":"2026-09-24T19:44:57","date_gmt":"2026-09-24T17:44:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/space-weapons-orbit-eth-poirier-switzerland-mediation-2026\/"},"modified":"2026-09-24T19:45:27","modified_gmt":"2026-09-24T17:45:27","slug":"space-weapons-orbit-eth-poirier-switzerland-mediation-2026","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/space-weapons-orbit-eth-poirier-switzerland-mediation-2026\/","title":{"rendered":"Space Weapons in Orbit: ETH Warning and Switzerland\u2019s Role"},"content":{"rendered":"\r\n<style>.et_pb_title_container h1.entry-title { padding-top: 40px !important; }<\/style>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p>Ten days ago the Secretary of the Air Force, Troy Meink, told a conference hall at National Harbor that the Space Force has on-orbit space control weapons. It was the first time a Pentagon official had said it plainly, and he confirmed afterwards that the phrasing had been deliberate. We covered the admission itself when it happened.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p>What has followed is more interesting than the announcement. The first substantial European expert response has come from Zurich, and it opens by deflating the story rather than inflating it.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p>Cl&eacute;mence Poirier is a senior researcher in cyberdefence at the Center for Security Studies at ETH Zurich. Asked by the <em>Tages-Anzeiger<\/em> whether the weapon the United States has now named was recently put into orbit, her answer was one word long.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<div style=\"background:#f5f5f5;border-left:4px solid #1a1a1a;padding:15px 20px;margin:20px 0\"><p style=\"margin:0 0 8px;font-weight:700\">Quick Facts<\/p><ul style=\"margin:0;padding-left:20px\"><li><strong>What was said:<\/strong> US Air Force Secretary Troy Meink confirmed the Space Force operates on-orbit space control weapons, 14 September 2026<\/li><li><strong>The expert view:<\/strong> Cl&eacute;mence Poirier, senior researcher, Center for Security Studies, ETH Zurich, interviewed by the Tages-Anzeiger<\/li><li><strong>Her central point:<\/strong> Nothing new was launched. An existing capability was relabelled as a weapon<\/li><li><strong>Legal position:<\/strong> The 1967 Outer Space Treaty bans only weapons of mass destruction in orbit. Conventional anti-satellite weapons are not prohibited<\/li><li><strong>The economic stake:<\/strong> A single day without GPS would cost the United States around $1 billion, by a Department of Commerce estimate<\/li><li><strong>The Swiss angle:<\/strong> Switzerland operates no state satellites, which Poirier argues makes it a candidate mediator &mdash; but the armed forces are spending CHF 850 million to change that<\/li><\/ul><\/div>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<h2 style=\"padding-top:22px\">The United States Did Not Launch Anything. It Renamed Something.<\/h2>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p>This is the part that got lost in the headlines, and it is the difference between an event and a statement.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<div style=\"background:#f8f9fa;border-left:4px solid #1565c0;padding:20px 22px;margin:18px 0 24px;font-size:16px;line-height:1.7;display:flex;gap:20px;align-items:flex-start\"><div><em>&ldquo;No. The United States has taken a capability it already possessed and has now designated it a weapon.&rdquo;<\/em><div style=\"margin-top:10px;font-size:14px;color:#555\"><strong>Cl&eacute;mence Poirier<\/strong> &mdash; Senior researcher, Center for Security Studies, ETH Zurich, speaking to the Tages-Anzeiger (translated from German)<\/div><\/div><\/div>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p>Nothing went up. Nothing changed in orbit on 14 September. What changed was a word, and Poirier\u2019s argument is that the word is the escalation. The growing armament of space has been visible for years, so the existence of the capability surprises nobody. Admitting it publicly is new, and other states may read the admission itself as a move &mdash; which produces a security dilemma and, from there, an arms race, with China and Russia the most likely to respond by accelerating their own counterspace programmes.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p>That is a specific and testable claim, and it is more useful than the alternative framing, which is that America has secretly parked a death ray over your house.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<h2 style=\"padding-top:22px\">Militarisation Is Sixty Years Old. Weaponisation Is Not.<\/h2>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p>Poirier draws a distinction that most coverage collapses, and everything downstream depends on it.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p>Militarisation means using satellites to support military operations on the ground: reconnaissance, communications, navigation, missile warning. That has been routine since the 1960s and nobody seriously contests it. Weaponisation means putting weapons in orbit. The first is about operations on Earth, assisted from space. The second is about space itself as the place where the fighting happens.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<div style=\"background:#f8f9fa;border-left:4px solid #c62828;padding:20px 22px;margin:18px 0 24px;font-size:16px;line-height:1.7;display:flex;gap:20px;align-items:flex-start\"><div><em>&ldquo;This is about the battlefield in orbit. That is new.&rdquo;<\/em><div style=\"margin-top:10px;font-size:14px;color:#555\"><strong>Cl&eacute;mence Poirier<\/strong> &mdash; Center for Security Studies, ETH Zurich (translated from German)<\/div><\/div><\/div>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p>She is also careful about where American capability actually sits. The United States holds weapons in every category &mdash; kinetic, non-kinetic, electronic and cyber &mdash; but most of them are on the ground, not in orbit. Ground-launched anti-satellite missiles are not orbital weapons, and conflating the two makes the situation look further along than it is.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p>The categories are worth keeping straight. Non-kinetic covers directed energy: lasers and microwaves. Electronic and cyber cover jamming and attacks on a satellite\u2019s links and software. Kinetic covers physically hitting the target, which so far has meant missiles fired from Earth. The United States, the Soviet Union and later Russia, China and India have all demonstrated this by destroying their own satellites.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p>The category that would genuinely change things is co-orbital kinetic: an armed satellite attacking another satellite. As far as anyone outside the programmes knows, that does not yet exist.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<h2 style=\"padding-top:22px\">The Treaty Bans Exactly One Thing<\/h2>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p>The 1967 Outer Space Treaty is usually invoked as though it prohibits weapons in space. It does not. It prohibits weapons of mass destruction in orbit, and nothing else.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<div style=\"background:#f8f9fa;border-left:4px solid #ef6c00;padding:20px 22px;margin:18px 0 24px;font-size:16px;line-height:1.7;display:flex;gap:20px;align-items:flex-start\"><div><em>&ldquo;Under the Outer Space Treaty, yes. There is an obvious gap in the regulation.&rdquo;<\/em><div style=\"margin-top:10px;font-size:14px;color:#555\"><strong>Cl&eacute;mence Poirier<\/strong> &mdash; Asked whether it is legal to destroy an enemy state\u2019s satellites with conventional weapons (translated from German)<\/div><\/div><\/div>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p>That gap also tells you what the American weapon almost certainly is not. Washington has repeatedly insisted its activities remain consistent with the treaty, and nuclear weapons are the single category the treaty explicitly forbids in orbit. Stating compliance and deploying the one banned thing would be an odd combination.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p>Efforts to close the gap have gone nowhere, and Poirier is blunt about why. China and Russia have proposed a treaty banning space weapons at the United Nations without defining what a space weapon is. A ban on an undefined object is not a ban.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<h2 style=\"padding-top:22px\">The One Time Somebody Did Set Off a Nuclear Weapon in Orbit<\/h2>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p>There is a reason the nuclear option sits in its own category, and it is not squeamishness. It is Starfish Prime.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p>On 9 July 1962 the United States detonated a 1.4 megaton warhead at an altitude of 400 km, carried up by a Thor rocket from Johnston Atoll and set off about 31 km to the south-west. It was not aimed at anything. There was nothing up there to aim at.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p>The electromagnetic pulse reached Hawaii, roughly 1,450 km away, where it knocked out around 300 streetlights and damaged a telephone company microwave link, cutting calls from Kauai to the other islands. That was the visible part. The lasting damage was above: the detonation pumped high-energy electrons into artificial radiation belts around the Earth, and over the following months six or more satellites died of it, their solar arrays and electronics degraded. Telstar 1, the first commercial communications relay, was among them. So were Transit 4B, Britain\u2019s first satellite Ariel 1, TRAAC and Injun.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p>A weapon detonated at nobody, in an orbit that was nearly empty, disabled a meaningful fraction of everything humanity had put in space. There are now roughly 14,000 active satellites.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<div style=\"position:relative;padding-bottom:56.25%;height:0;overflow:hidden;margin:24px 0\"><iframe class=\"skip-lazy\" data-no-lazy=\"1\" loading=\"eager\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/sXC9-sBoLEU\" style=\"position:absolute;top:0;left:0;width:100%;height:100%;border:0\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/div>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<h2 style=\"padding-top:22px\">Why Nobody Wants This, the United States Least of All<\/h2>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p>Poirier makes a point that cuts against the instinct to read the American announcement as sabre-rattling: the United States has more to lose in orbit than anyone.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p>It operates the most satellites and has the most space-dependent economy. Shooting down someone else\u2019s satellite produces a debris cloud that does not check passports, and a piece of debris one centimetre across can destroy a multi-tonne spacecraft. A significant share of the debris already up there comes from anti-satellite tests. Cascading collisions &mdash; the Kessler syndrome &mdash; are showing early signs at some altitudes.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\" style=\"margin:0 0 24px;width:100%\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"skip-lazy\" data-no-lazy=\"1\" loading=\"eager\" width=\"1024\" src=\"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2026\/09\/tracked-orbital-debris-geosynchronous-ring-nasa.jpg\" alt=\"NASA plot of tracked objects in Earth orbit showing the dense low orbit cloud and the geosynchronous ring\" style=\"width:100%;height:auto;max-width:100%;display:block\"><figcaption style=\"font-size:13px;color:#777;text-align:center;margin-top:6px;font-style:italic\">Tracked objects in Earth orbit. The dense inner cloud is low Earth orbit; the outer ring is geosynchronous. NASA Orbital Debris Program Office \/ Wikimedia Commons<\/figcaption><\/figure>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p>And then there is the number that makes the point without any hardware at all. A calculation by the US Department of Commerce found that if GPS alone were unavailable in the United States for a single day, it would cost the American economy in the order of $1 billion. Not the satellites. Not the launch. Just the absence of the signal, for one day.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p>Space is the one domain where the strongest power is also the most exposed.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<h2 style=\"padding-top:22px\">The Swiss Opening<\/h2>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p>This is where the interview stops being a briefing and starts being a proposal, and it is the part with direct consequences for Bern.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p>Poirier\u2019s argument is that Switzerland is unusually well placed to mediate in orbit, and the reason is almost absurdly simple: it has no state satellites of its own. A country with nothing in orbit has no position to defend up there, which makes it credible in a way that no other European state currently is.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<div style=\"background:#f8f9fa;border-left:4px solid #2e7d32;padding:20px 22px;margin:18px 0 24px;font-size:16px;line-height:1.7;display:flex;gap:20px;align-items:flex-start\"><div><em>&ldquo;Since Switzerland does not yet have its own state satellites in orbit, it could act as a truly neutral instance and mediate, for example in disputes over possible satellite collisions and in conflicts.&rdquo;<\/em><div style=\"margin-top:10px;font-size:14px;color:#555\"><strong>Cl&eacute;mence Poirier<\/strong> &mdash; On a Swiss role in space diplomacy (translated from German)<\/div><\/div><\/div>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p>The specific jobs she sketches are not abstract. Opening channels between operators who have no way of talking to each other. Confidence-building before an incident and de-escalation after one. Mediating for states with no diplomatic relations at all &mdash; she names North and South Korea, and Israel and Iran. And then the genuinely novel work: what does a ceasefire in orbit even look like? How do you withdraw from a conflict in orbit? How do you monitor a truce there? How do you deactivate systems you cannot simply unplug? Nobody has answers, and somebody will need them.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\" style=\"margin:0 0 24px;width:100%\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"skip-lazy\" data-no-lazy=\"1\" loading=\"eager\" width=\"1024\" src=\"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2026\/09\/eth-zurich-main-building-night.jpg\" alt=\"The main building of ETH Zurich at night, home of the Center for Security Studies\" style=\"width:100%;height:auto;max-width:100%;display:block\"><figcaption style=\"font-size:13px;color:#777;text-align:center;margin-top:6px;font-style:italic\">ETH Zurich, where the Center for Security Studies has been developing the case for extending Swiss mediation into orbit. Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 3.0<\/figcaption><\/figure>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<h2 style=\"padding-top:22px\">And How Narrow the Window Is<\/h2>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p>Here is the part the interview gestures at with one word &mdash; <em>yet<\/em> &mdash; and which deserves spelling out, because it is on a published timetable.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p>The Swiss Armed Forces are in the middle of acquiring exactly the thing whose absence underpins the neutrality argument. A Space Competence Centre was established on 1 January 2026, sitting inside the Joint Operations Command within the Swiss Air Force. The programme carries a cost ceiling of CHF 850 million over twelve years, covering investment and operation, and is staffed by 222 specialist conscripts plus a professional core team. The first concrete services, in Earth observation and telecommunications, are expected in 2027 and 2028.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p>Five capabilities are declared. An operational picture of activity and threats in space. Earth observation for intelligence, reconnaissance and surveillance. Redundant and resilient troop communications. Precision navigation. And, fifth, countermeasures: protection against space-based reconnaissance and the disruption of hostile systems.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p>Read that last one again. It is, in the vocabulary Poirier uses earlier in the same interview, a counterspace capability. Modest, defensive in intent, and entirely reasonable for a country that currently depends on foreign infrastructure for everything it sees and sends. It is also the precise category of thing that makes a state a participant rather than a referee.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p>So the window is roughly two years wide. Switzerland can credibly offer itself as the neutral instance in orbit for about as long as it has nothing in orbit, and it has already bought the ticket out of that position. Whether those two things can coexist &mdash; a small sovereign constellation and a mediating role &mdash; is a policy question nobody in Bern appears to have been asked yet. It is worth asking now rather than in 2028.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<div style=\"position:relative;padding-bottom:56.25%;height:0;overflow:hidden;margin:24px 0\"><iframe class=\"skip-lazy\" data-no-lazy=\"1\" loading=\"eager\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/_fDKjjfgCDg\" style=\"position:absolute;top:0;left:0;width:100%;height:100%;border:0\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/div>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<h2 style=\"padding-top:22px\">What Europe Should Actually Ask For<\/h2>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p>Poirier\u2019s recommendation for European states is deliberately unglamorous. Go through diplomatic channels and ask the Americans which weapons they are talking about.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p>It does not have to be public. It does have to be shared. Allies who are expected to plan around a capability should be able to know what the capability is, and at the moment European governments are reading about it in the same conference reports as everybody else. That is a thin basis for an alliance in a domain where the response time to an incident is measured in minutes.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p style=\"font-size:14px;color:#777;font-style:italic;margin-top:28px\">Sources: Interview with Cl&eacute;mence Poirier by Joachim Laukenmann, <em>Tages-Anzeiger<\/em>, 21 September 2026 (quotations translated from German); Center for Security Studies, ETH Zurich; swissinfo.ch; the Swiss Armed Forces (vtg.admin.ch) on space-based capabilities; NASA Orbital Debris Program Office; US Department of Commerce GPS economic impact study; Wikipedia entry for Starfish Prime<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<style>.mfq{margin:34px 0 8px}.mfq h2{font:26px\/1.3 \"Gilroy semiBold\",Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;color:#0d1117;padding-top:22px;margin:0 0 6px}.mfq .qa details{border-top:1px solid #5C91FF;margin:0;padding:0}.mfq .qa details:last-of-type{border-bottom:1px solid #e2e7ee}.mfq .qa summary{cursor:pointer;list-style:none;display:flex;justify-content:space-between;align-items:center;gap:16px;padding:22px 26px;font:18px\/1.7 \"Gilroy semiBold\",Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;color:#0d1117}.mfq .qa summary::-webkit-details-marker{display:none}.mfq .qa summary::after{content:\"+\";font:24px Helvetica,sans-serif;color:#3568e0;flex:0 0 auto}.mfq .qa details[open] summary::after{content:\"\\2013\"}.mfq .qa details:hover summary{color:#3568e0}.mfq .qa .a{font:16px\/1.7 \"Gilroy regular\",Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;color:#454e5e;padding:0 26px 24px}.mfq .qa .a a{color:#3568e0}@media(max-width:680px){.mfq .qa summary{padding:18px 14px;font-size:17px}.mfq .qa .a{padding:0 14px 20px}}<\/style>\r\n\r\n\r\n<section class=\"mfq\"><h2>Frequently Asked Questions<\/h2><div class=\"qa\"><details open><summary>Did the United States just put a new weapon into orbit?<\/summary><div class=\"a\">No. According to Clemence Poirier of the Center for Security Studies at ETH Zurich, the United States took a capability it already possessed and publicly designated it a weapon. Nothing was launched on 14 September 2026. What changed was the language, which she argues is itself a form of escalation.<\/div><\/details><details><summary>Are weapons in space legal?<\/summary><div class=\"a\">Mostly yes. The 1967 Outer Space Treaty prohibits only weapons of mass destruction in orbit. Conventional anti-satellite weapons, directed energy weapons, electronic warfare and cyber attacks against satellites are not banned by it. Poirier calls this an obvious gap in the regulation.<\/div><\/details><details><summary>What is the difference between militarisation and weaponisation of space?<\/summary><div class=\"a\">Militarisation means using satellites to support military operations on the ground, such as reconnaissance and communications, and has been routine since the 1960s. Weaponisation means placing weapons in orbit so that space itself becomes the battlefield. Only the second is new.<\/div><\/details><details><summary>Has a nuclear weapon ever been detonated in space?<\/summary><div class=\"a\">Yes. The United States detonated the 1.4 megaton Starfish Prime device at 400 km altitude on 9 July 1962, launched by a Thor rocket from Johnston Atoll. It was not aimed at any target. The electromagnetic pulse knocked out around 300 streetlights in Hawaii some 1,450 km away and the resulting artificial radiation belts disabled six or more satellites, including Telstar 1 and Ariel 1.<\/div><\/details><details><summary>Why would the United States not want a war in orbit?<\/summary><div class=\"a\">Because it has the most satellites and the most space-dependent economy of any country. Destroying a satellite creates debris that threatens every operator including the attacker. A US Department of Commerce estimate found that a single day without GPS would cost the American economy around one billion dollars.<\/div><\/details><details><summary>Why could Switzerland mediate conflicts in space?<\/summary><div class=\"a\">Because it currently operates no state satellites of its own, which means it has no orbital assets to defend and can act as a genuinely neutral party. Poirier proposes Swiss roles in opening channels between operators, confidence-building, mediating collision disputes, and working out what a ceasefire in orbit would even look like.<\/div><\/details><details><summary>Is Switzerland building its own military satellites?<\/summary><div class=\"a\">Yes. The Swiss Armed Forces established a Space Competence Centre on 1 January 2026 within the Joint Operations Command of the Swiss Air Force, with a cost ceiling of CHF 850 million over twelve years and 222 specialist conscripts. First Earth observation and telecommunications services are expected in 2027 and 2028, and one of the five declared capabilities is countermeasures against hostile systems.<\/div><\/details><\/div><\/section>\r\n\r\n\r\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@type\":\"FAQPage\",\"mainEntity\":[{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"name\":\"Did the United States just put a new weapon into orbit?\",\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"No. According to Clemence Poirier of the Center for Security Studies at ETH Zurich, the United States took a capability it already possessed and publicly designated it a weapon. Nothing was launched on 14 September 2026. What changed was the language, which she argues is itself a form of escalation.\"}},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"name\":\"Are weapons in space legal?\",\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"Mostly yes. The 1967 Outer Space Treaty prohibits only weapons of mass destruction in orbit. Conventional anti-satellite weapons, directed energy weapons, electronic warfare and cyber attacks against satellites are not banned by it. Poirier calls this an obvious gap in the regulation.\"}},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"name\":\"What is the difference between militarisation and weaponisation of space?\",\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"Militarisation means using satellites to support military operations on the ground, such as reconnaissance and communications, and has been routine since the 1960s. Weaponisation means placing weapons in orbit so that space itself becomes the battlefield. Only the second is new.\"}},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"name\":\"Has a nuclear weapon ever been detonated in space?\",\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"Yes. The United States detonated the 1.4 megaton Starfish Prime device at 400 km altitude on 9 July 1962, launched by a Thor rocket from Johnston Atoll. It was not aimed at any target. The electromagnetic pulse knocked out around 300 streetlights in Hawaii some 1,450 km away and the resulting artificial radiation belts disabled six or more satellites, including Telstar 1 and Ariel 1.\"}},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"name\":\"Why would the United States not want a war in orbit?\",\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"Because it has the most satellites and the most space-dependent economy of any country. Destroying a satellite creates debris that threatens every operator including the attacker. A US Department of Commerce estimate found that a single day without GPS would cost the American economy around one billion dollars.\"}},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"name\":\"Why could Switzerland mediate conflicts in space?\",\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"Because it currently operates no state satellites of its own, which means it has no orbital assets to defend and can act as a genuinely neutral party. Poirier proposes Swiss roles in opening channels between operators, confidence-building, mediating collision disputes, and working out what a ceasefire in orbit would even look like.\"}},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"name\":\"Is Switzerland building its own military satellites?\",\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"Yes. The Swiss Armed Forces established a Space Competence Centre on 1 January 2026 within the Joint Operations Command of the Swiss Air Force, with a cost ceiling of CHF 850 million over twelve years and 222 specialist conscripts. First Earth observation and telecommunications services are expected in 2027 and 2028, and one of the five declared capabilities is countermeasures against hostile systems.\"}}]}<\/script><div style=\"background:#f0f4ff;border-left:4px solid #5C91FF;padding:16px 20px;margin:32px 0 8px\"><p style=\"margin:0 0 8px;font-weight:600;color:#333\">Related Posts<\/p><p style=\"margin:4px 0\"><a href=\"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/space-force-on-orbit-space-control-weapons-meink-afa-2026\/\">Space Force On-Orbit Weapons: America Admits It Has Them<\/a><\/p><p style=\"margin:4px 0\"><a href=\"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/ghost-r-northrop-true-anomaly-geo-reconnaissance-satellites-2026\/\">Ghost-R: Northrop and True Anomaly Build GEO Reconnaissance Satellites<\/a><\/p><p style=\"margin:4px 0\"><a href=\"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/bodyguard-satellites-the-new-space-arms-race\/\">Bodyguard Satellites: The New Space Arms Race<\/a><\/p><p style=\"margin:4px 0\"><a href=\"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/asm-135-asat-f-15-solwind-satellite-shootdown-1985\/\">ASM-135 ASAT: The F-15 That Shot Down a Satellite<\/a><\/p><\/div>\r\n\r\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>An ETH Zurich researcher says the US admission was a relabelling, not a launch &#8211; and that Switzerland has a narrow window to become the mediator in orbit before its own CHF 850 million satellite programme closes it.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":25,"featured_media":24485676,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"editor_notices":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[664,670],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-24485971","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-military-aviation","category-news"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v28.5 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Space Weapons in Orbit: the Swiss Angle | MiGFlug<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"An ETH Zurich researcher on the US admission of space weapons in orbit, why it is a relabelling rather than a launch, and Switzerland\u2019s narrow window to mediate.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/space-weapons-orbit-eth-poirier-switzerland-mediation-2026\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Space Weapons in Orbit: the Swiss Angle | MiGFlug\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"An ETH Zurich researcher on the US admission of space weapons in orbit, why it is a relabelling rather than a launch, and Switzerland\u2019s narrow window to mediate.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/space-weapons-orbit-eth-poirier-switzerland-mediation-2026\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Afterburner - MiGFlug&#039;s Magazine\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/MiGFlug\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-09-24T17:44:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-09-24T17:45:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2026\/09\/gssap-geosynchronous-inspector-satellites-space-force.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1700\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1139\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Fortun\u00e9 Leroy\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@migflug\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@migflug\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Fortun\u00e9 Leroy\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"14 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/space-weapons-orbit-eth-poirier-switzerland-mediation-2026\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/space-weapons-orbit-eth-poirier-switzerland-mediation-2026\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Fortun\u00e9 Leroy\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/it\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/8de428a67c070c9b49afaa026328a4e3\"},\"headline\":\"Space Weapons in Orbit: ETH Warning and Switzerland\u2019s Role\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-09-24T17:44:57+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-09-24T17:45:27+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/space-weapons-orbit-eth-poirier-switzerland-mediation-2026\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":2409,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/it\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/space-weapons-orbit-eth-poirier-switzerland-mediation-2026\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/4\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/gssap-geosynchronous-inspector-satellites-space-force.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Military Aviation\",\"News\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/space-weapons-orbit-eth-poirier-switzerland-mediation-2026\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/space-weapons-orbit-eth-poirier-switzerland-mediation-2026\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/space-weapons-orbit-eth-poirier-switzerland-mediation-2026\\\/\",\"name\":\"Space Weapons in Orbit: the Swiss Angle | MiGFlug\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/it\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/space-weapons-orbit-eth-poirier-switzerland-mediation-2026\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/space-weapons-orbit-eth-poirier-switzerland-mediation-2026\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/4\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/gssap-geosynchronous-inspector-satellites-space-force.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-09-24T17:44:57+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-09-24T17:45:27+00:00\",\"description\":\"An ETH Zurich researcher on the US admission of space weapons in orbit, why it is a relabelling rather than a launch, and Switzerland\u2019s narrow window to mediate.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/space-weapons-orbit-eth-poirier-switzerland-mediation-2026\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/space-weapons-orbit-eth-poirier-switzerland-mediation-2026\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/space-weapons-orbit-eth-poirier-switzerland-mediation-2026\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/4\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/gssap-geosynchronous-inspector-satellites-space-force.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/4\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/gssap-geosynchronous-inspector-satellites-space-force.jpg\",\"width\":1700,\"height\":1139,\"caption\":\"US Space Force \\\/ Wikimedia Commons, public domain\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/space-weapons-orbit-eth-poirier-switzerland-mediation-2026\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Startseite\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/it\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Space Weapons in Orbit: ETH Warning and Switzerland\u2019s Role\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/it\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/it\\\/\",\"name\":\"Afterburner - MiGFlug's Magazine\",\"description\":\"for those interested in flying military jets and aviation related  topics\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/it\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/it\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/it\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"MiGFlug GmbH\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/it\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/it\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ml5psubhxdln.i.optimole.com\\\/cb:0e0_.b970\\\/w:897\\\/h:278\\\/q:mauto\\\/ig:avif\\\/https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/4\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/MIGFLUG_LOGO-no-background.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ml5psubhxdln.i.optimole.com\\\/cb:0e0_.b970\\\/w:897\\\/h:278\\\/q:mauto\\\/ig:avif\\\/https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/4\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/MIGFLUG_LOGO-no-background.png\",\"width\":897,\"height\":278,\"caption\":\"MiGFlug GmbH\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/it\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/MiGFlug\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/migflug\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.instagram.com\\\/migflug\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/user\\\/MiGFlug\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/company\\\/migflug.com\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.pinterest.ch\\\/migflug\\\/\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/it\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/8de428a67c070c9b49afaa026328a4e3\",\"name\":\"Fortun\u00e9 Leroy\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/24d828074a1cc6684638b2dcfc98a9dd85a2e06b37adfd74d20fae209f234190?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/24d828074a1cc6684638b2dcfc98a9dd85a2e06b37adfd74d20fae209f234190?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/24d828074a1cc6684638b2dcfc98a9dd85a2e06b37adfd74d20fae209f234190?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Fortun\u00e9 Leroy\"},\"description\":\"Fortun\u00e9 Leroy covers French and European aerospace, from Rafale and Airbus to NATO strategy and the continent\u2019s defence industry.\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/migflug.com\\\/afterburner\\\/author\\\/fortuneleroy\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Space Weapons in Orbit: the Swiss Angle | MiGFlug","description":"An ETH Zurich researcher on the US admission of space weapons in orbit, why it is a relabelling rather than a launch, and Switzerland\u2019s narrow window to mediate.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/space-weapons-orbit-eth-poirier-switzerland-mediation-2026\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Space Weapons in Orbit: the Swiss Angle | MiGFlug","og_description":"An ETH Zurich researcher on the US admission of space weapons in orbit, why it is a relabelling rather than a launch, and Switzerland\u2019s narrow window to mediate.","og_url":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/space-weapons-orbit-eth-poirier-switzerland-mediation-2026\/","og_site_name":"Afterburner - MiGFlug's Magazine","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/MiGFlug\/","article_published_time":"2026-09-24T17:44:57+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-09-24T17:45:27+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1700,"height":1139,"url":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2026\/09\/gssap-geosynchronous-inspector-satellites-space-force.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Fortun\u00e9 Leroy","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@migflug","twitter_site":"@migflug","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Fortun\u00e9 Leroy","Est. reading time":"14 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/space-weapons-orbit-eth-poirier-switzerland-mediation-2026\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/space-weapons-orbit-eth-poirier-switzerland-mediation-2026\/"},"author":{"name":"Fortun\u00e9 Leroy","@id":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/it\/#\/schema\/person\/8de428a67c070c9b49afaa026328a4e3"},"headline":"Space Weapons in Orbit: ETH Warning and Switzerland\u2019s Role","datePublished":"2026-09-24T17:44:57+00:00","dateModified":"2026-09-24T17:45:27+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/space-weapons-orbit-eth-poirier-switzerland-mediation-2026\/"},"wordCount":2409,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/it\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/space-weapons-orbit-eth-poirier-switzerland-mediation-2026\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2026\/09\/gssap-geosynchronous-inspector-satellites-space-force.jpg","articleSection":["Military Aviation","News"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/space-weapons-orbit-eth-poirier-switzerland-mediation-2026\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/space-weapons-orbit-eth-poirier-switzerland-mediation-2026\/","url":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/space-weapons-orbit-eth-poirier-switzerland-mediation-2026\/","name":"Space Weapons in Orbit: the Swiss Angle | MiGFlug","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/it\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/space-weapons-orbit-eth-poirier-switzerland-mediation-2026\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/space-weapons-orbit-eth-poirier-switzerland-mediation-2026\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2026\/09\/gssap-geosynchronous-inspector-satellites-space-force.jpg","datePublished":"2026-09-24T17:44:57+00:00","dateModified":"2026-09-24T17:45:27+00:00","description":"An ETH Zurich researcher on the US admission of space weapons in orbit, why it is a relabelling rather than a launch, and Switzerland\u2019s narrow window to mediate.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/space-weapons-orbit-eth-poirier-switzerland-mediation-2026\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/space-weapons-orbit-eth-poirier-switzerland-mediation-2026\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/space-weapons-orbit-eth-poirier-switzerland-mediation-2026\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2026\/09\/gssap-geosynchronous-inspector-satellites-space-force.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2026\/09\/gssap-geosynchronous-inspector-satellites-space-force.jpg","width":1700,"height":1139,"caption":"US Space Force \/ Wikimedia Commons, public domain"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/space-weapons-orbit-eth-poirier-switzerland-mediation-2026\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Startseite","item":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/it\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Space Weapons in Orbit: ETH Warning and Switzerland\u2019s Role"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/it\/#website","url":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/it\/","name":"Afterburner - MiGFlug's Magazine","description":"for those interested in flying military jets and aviation related  topics","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/it\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/it\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/it\/#organization","name":"MiGFlug GmbH","url":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/it\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/it\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/ml5psubhxdln.i.optimole.com\/cb:0e0_.b970\/w:897\/h:278\/q:mauto\/ig:avif\/https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2026\/06\/MIGFLUG_LOGO-no-background.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/ml5psubhxdln.i.optimole.com\/cb:0e0_.b970\/w:897\/h:278\/q:mauto\/ig:avif\/https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2026\/06\/MIGFLUG_LOGO-no-background.png","width":897,"height":278,"caption":"MiGFlug GmbH"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/it\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/MiGFlug\/","https:\/\/x.com\/migflug","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/migflug\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/MiGFlug","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/migflug.com\/","https:\/\/www.pinterest.ch\/migflug\/"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/it\/#\/schema\/person\/8de428a67c070c9b49afaa026328a4e3","name":"Fortun\u00e9 Leroy","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/24d828074a1cc6684638b2dcfc98a9dd85a2e06b37adfd74d20fae209f234190?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/24d828074a1cc6684638b2dcfc98a9dd85a2e06b37adfd74d20fae209f234190?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/24d828074a1cc6684638b2dcfc98a9dd85a2e06b37adfd74d20fae209f234190?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Fortun\u00e9 Leroy"},"description":"Fortun\u00e9 Leroy covers French and European aerospace, from Rafale and Airbus to NATO strategy and the continent\u2019s defence industry.","url":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/author\/fortuneleroy\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24485971","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/25"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=24485971"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24485971\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":24486041,"href":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24485971\/revisions\/24486041"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/24485676"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=24485971"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=24485971"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/afterburner\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=24485971"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}