{"id":2075,"date":"2014-06-12T12:22:56","date_gmt":"2014-06-12T12:22:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.migflug.com\/jetflights\/?p=2075"},"modified":"2018-11-22T17:41:26","modified_gmt":"2018-11-22T16:41:26","slug":"lockheed-martin-f-35-is-it-as-bad-as-some-say","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/migflug.com\/jetflights\/lockheed-martin-f-35-is-it-as-bad-as-some-say\/","title":{"rendered":"Lockheed Martin F-35 – As bad as Critics say?"},"content":{"rendered":"
The Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II has been widely debated over not only since its first flight in 2006. The project has cost over 1 trillion dollars so far and is expected to reach over 1.5 trillion during its lifetime. But an aircraft costing this much money can hardly be what people say about it: Rubbish, Lemon, can’t do what airplanes did 50 years ago\u00a0etc.\u00a0The reason for this is that it may have\u00a0been reviewed in a questionable way; when people are comparing it to other aircraft they might not compare it in the right way. This article will try to outline\u00a0what the F-35 really is and why it might be better than some critics say.<\/p>\n