You'd think the hardest part of flying would be, well, the flying. The physics. The weather. The engines. But no — sometimes the hardest part is finding the right airport. And before you assume this only happens to student pilots in Cessnas, consider this: it has happened to airline captains, military transport crews, and even the pilots of the largest aircraft Boeing has ever modified.
Landing at the wrong airport is surprisingly common. The FAA doesn't even track it as a separate category because the list would be embarrassing. What they do track is "wrong surface events," and the numbers suggest this happens more often than anyone in the industry likes to admit.
Here are some of the most spectacular cases of highly trained professionals touching down at completely the wrong airfield — and the reactions that followed.
Informations clés
Official term: "Wrong airport landing" or "wrong surface event"
How common: The FAA has documented dozens of cases since 2000
Biggest aircraft involved: Boeing 747 Dreamlifter (2013)
Most common cause: Visual confusion between nearby airports
The Dreamlifter's Tiny Airport Problem
On November 20, 2013, a Boeing 747 Dreamlifter — a massive modified 747 designed to carry fuselage sections for the 787 — landed at Colonel James Jabara Airport in Wichita, Kansas. The problem? It was supposed to land at McConnell Air Force Base, nine miles to the south.
Jabara Airport has a 6,101-foot runway. The Dreamlifter, one of the largest cargo aircraft on the planet, typically needs about 9,000 feet. The pilots had somehow confused two airports that look nothing alike from the air. When the tower at McConnell asked where they were, the reply was the kind of calm professional understatement that only pilots can deliver: "We just landed at the other airport."
The next morning, Boeing calculated that the Dreamlifter could take off from the shorter runway — barely — if they burned off enough fuel first. The jet departed successfully, but not before every aviation journalist in America had written the headline they'd been waiting their whole careers for.
Southwest's Branson Mixup
On January 12, 2014, Southwest Airlines Flight 4013 was supposed to land at Branson Airport (BBG) in Missouri. Instead, it touched down at M. Graham Clark Downtown Airport — a small general aviation field seven miles north with a runway of just 3,738 feet. The Boeing 737-700 normally needs about 5,000 feet.
The aircraft stopped just 300 feet from the end of the runway and a steep drop-off. The 124 passengers were bused to the correct airport. The NTSB investigation found that the pilots had the wrong airport's lights in sight during a dark approach and simply flew to what they could see rather than what their instruments were telling them.
The captain had 16,000 hours of flight time. Experience doesn't make you immune to the most basic of errors — it sometimes makes you overconfident enough to commit them.
The C-17 at Peter O. Knight
In 2012, a U.S. Air Force C-17 Globemaster III — a 170-foot-wingspan military transport that can carry 170,000 pounds of cargo — landed at Peter O. Knight Airport in Tampa, Florida. Peter O. Knight is a small general aviation airport on Davis Islands with a 3,580-foot runway. The C-17 was supposed to land at nearby MacDill Air Force Base.
The C-17 can actually operate from short runways — it was designed for austere airfields — but that wasn't really the point. The point was that a crew flying a $218 million military aircraft managed to confuse two airports that are roughly four miles apart and look entirely different.
The Air Force quietly dealt with the matter internally. The C-17 departed the next day without incident. Local residents reported the experience as "terrifyingly loud."
The Lufthansa A340 That Nearly Landed in Frankfurt... Hahn
This one is more legend than confirmed incident, but aviation circles have long whispered about Lufthansa wide-body crews nearly lining up with Frankfurt-Hahn Airport — a former U.S. Air Force base 120 kilometres west of Frankfurt Main. Ryanair uses Hahn and famously calls it "Frankfurt" in its marketing. The confusion isn't limited to budget airline passengers.
Several verified cases involve smaller aircraft and private jets lining up for the wrong Frankfurt, but the big-iron near-misses remain unconfirmed. What is confirmed is that the FAA and EASA have both issued guidance on "airport proximity confusion," and Frankfurt is always the example they use.
Why Does This Keep Happening?
The answer is depressingly human. Pilots are trained to fly by instruments, but during visual approaches — especially at night or in unfamiliar territory — they revert to looking out the window. And when two airports are within visual range of each other, the bigger, brighter one isn't always the right one.
Modern GPS makes it almost impossible to get lost. But GPS tells you where you are — not necessarily where you're looking. The disconnect between instruments and eyeballs has caused more wrong-airport landings than anyone cares to count.
The good news? Nobody has died from a wrong-airport landing in commercial aviation. The bad news? Statistically, it's only a matter of time before a heavy jet lands on a runway that's too short to stop. And when that happens, "I thought that was the right airport" won't make for a very satisfying accident report.
Sources: NTSB, FAA Safety Alerts, Aviation Safety Network, Boeing Safety Reports
Questions connexes
Combien de fois les pilotes atterrissent-ils au mauvais aéroport ?
Plus fréquemment que le secteur ne veut bien l'admettre. La FAA ne recense pas les atterrissages sur le mauvais aéroport comme une catégorie distincte, mais elle enregistre les " incidents de surface " et a documenté des dizaines de cas d'atterrissages sur le mauvais aéroport depuis 2000. Ces cas concernent aussi bien des élèves pilotes que des commandants de bord et des équipages de transport militaire.
Quel est le plus gros avion à avoir atterri au mauvais aéroport ?
Le Boeing 747 Dreamlifter, un 747 modifié de taille imposante conçu pour transporter des sections de fuselage de 787, a atterri le 20 novembre 2013 à l'aéroport Colonel James Jabara de Wichita, au Kansas, au lieu de la base aérienne McConnell située à neuf miles au sud. Des avions cargo hors gabarit comme le précédent Guppy " baleines volantes " partager cette lignée surdimensionnée.
Que s'est-il passé lors de l'atterrissage raté du Boeing Dreamlifter en 2013 ?
Le Dreamlifter a atterri à l'aéroport de Jabara, dont la piste mesure 1 860 mètres, alors que l'appareil nécessite généralement une piste d'environ 2 743 mètres. Le lendemain matin, après avoir consommé suffisamment de carburant pour réduire son poids, Boeing a calculé qu'il pouvait décoller en toute sécurité depuis la piste plus courte, et l'avion a décollé avec succès.
Quel était le mauvais aéroport d'atterrissage de Southwest Airlines ?
Le 12 janvier 2014, le vol 4013 de Southwest a atterri à l'aéroport M. Graham Clark Downtown au lieu de l'aéroport de Branson, dans le Missouri, situé à environ 11 kilomètres au sud. Le Boeing 737-700 s'est posé sur une piste de 1 139 mètres, bien en deçà des quelque 1 524 mètres nécessaires habituellement, mais s'est immobilisé sans incident.
Quelle est la cause la plus fréquente des atterrissages dans le mauvais aéroport ?
Confusion visuelle entre aéroports proches l'un de l'autre, surtout lorsqu'un terrain plus petit apparaît en premier sur la trajectoire d'approche et que les pilotes fixent leur regard sur la première surface ressemblant à une piste qu'ils aperçoivent. Lire correctement marquages de piste est une protection contre cette erreur.
Qu'est-ce qu'un " événement de surface incorrect " ?
L'expression « incident de surface incorrecte » utilisée par la FAA désigne un atterrissage, ou une tentative d'atterrissage, sur la mauvaise piste, une voie de circulation ou le mauvais aéroport. L'agence surveille ces incidents car ils sont suffisamment fréquents pour constituer un problème de sécurité avéré, même pour les équipages professionnels les plus expérimentés.
Articles similaires
0 Comments