The Mach 7 Railgun Refuses to Die

by | Jun 19, 2026 | News | 0 comments

It needs no gunpowder, no explosive warhead, and no rocket motor. It simply uses electricity and magnetism to fling a chunk of metal at seven times the speed of sound, destroying its target through raw kinetic energy. For a while, the electromagnetic railgun looked like the future of naval gunnery. Then, in 2021, the U.S. Navy quietly killed it. Now it is clawing its way back.

Quick Facts

  • Weapon: the electromagnetic railgun — it fires a slug with magnetic force, not gunpowder
  • Speed: hypersonic, around Mach 7 (roughly 2.5 km/s); it destroys targets with kinetic energy alone
  • US program: about $500 million over ~15 years (2005–2021), then paused
  • Why it stalled: barrels wore out fast, the power demands were enormous, and hypersonic missiles offered an easier path
  • The comeback: the US quietly resumed trials in 2025, while Japan and China press ahead

Fire Without Gunpowder

A railgun works on a beautifully simple principle. Run an enormous electric current down two parallel rails with a conductive projectile bridging them, and the resulting magnetic field generates a force — the Lorentz force — that hurls the projectile down the rails and out the muzzle. No chemical propellant is involved. In a record 2008 test at Dahlgren, the Navy’s gun fired at 10.64 megajoules of energy and a muzzle velocity of 2,520 metres per second — well beyond Mach 7. At those speeds a solid slug doesn’t need to explode; the impact alone is devastating.

A US Navy electromagnetic railgun fires during a test
A frame from a high-speed camera captures a record-setting U.S. Navy railgun firing at Dahlgren, Virginia. (Photo: U.S. Navy / Office of Naval Research)

Why the Navy Gave Up

The promise was a gun that could hit targets 100 nautical miles away with cheap, un-explosive rounds. The reality proved brutal. The same forces that accelerate the projectile chew up the rails, so barrels wore out after relatively few shots. The energy required to fire was so vast that almost no warship could supply it at a useful rate. And as the program dragged past a decade and half a billion dollars, hypersonic missiles emerged as a faster route to the same goal.

“The decision to pause [the program came] in light of fiscal constraints, combat system integration challenges and the prospective technology maturation of other weapon concepts.”
U.S. Navy — Official statement on pausing the railgun, 2021
A US Navy electromagnetic railgun launcher
The railgun’s rails take enormous punishment with every shot – barrel wear was one of the program’s hardest problems. (Photo: U.S. Navy)

The Comeback

Reports of the railgun’s death may have been premature. The U.S. Navy has quietly resumed live-fire railgun research, with trials at White Sands Missile Range in 2025. Japan has gone further still, firing a railgun from a warship and refining it specifically to shoot down incoming hypersonic missiles. China, too, has been testing a shipborne railgun for years.

The logic driving the revival is simple economics: against a flood of expensive hypersonic missiles, a gun that fires cheap kinetic slugs — if the engineering can be tamed — is an attractive shield. The weapon that was too hard to build may yet get a second life.

Sources: U.S. Naval Surface Warfare Center; Office of Naval Research; 19FortyFive; Asia Times; Military.com.

Related Posts

The CIA Huey That Shot Down a Biplane

The CIA Huey That Shot Down a Biplane

High above the misty jungle mountains of Laos, an unarmed supply helicopter found itself in the middle of an air raid. Its crew had a choice: flee, or fight back with the only weapon on board — a single AK-47 rifle. They chose to fight. What happened next has...

No, Emma Stone Did Not Fly an F-22

No, Emma Stone Did Not Fly an F-22

Every so often, a clip resurfaces online claiming that the Hollywood star Emma Stone made history as “the first civilian to fly in an F-22 Raptor.” It collects millions of views, a flurry of amazed comments, and the occasional breathless re-share. It is...

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

en_USEnglish