FQ-42 Vengeance and FQ-44 Fury: USAF Wants 500 CCAs by 2032

by | Sep 15, 2026 | Militärische Luftfahrt, Nachricht | 0 comments

Three numbers changed on Monday morning, and one name.

Speaking at the Air & Space Forces Association’s conference in National Harbor, Secretary of the Air Force Troy Meink said the service now intends to have at least 500 Collaborative Combat Aircraft in service by 2032. In June, the figure he gave publicly was “over 150” by the end of the decade. He added a second fleet of 500 cheaper drones on top of it. And he gave the two aircraft already in production their combat names: FQ-42 Vengeance and FQ-44 Wut.

Only one of those names is new. Anduril’s FQ-44 has been called Fury since the prototype was unveiled. General Atomics’ FQ-42 had a company name already, and it was not Vengeance.

Kurzinfo

Angekündigt14 September 2026, keynote by SecAF Troy Meink, AFA Air, Space & Cyber Conference
CCA targetAt least 500 in service by 2032 (previously “over 150” by 2029)
CCA typesFQ-42 Vengeance (General Atomics), FQ-44 Fury (Anduril), both Increment 1
Name changeThe FQ-42 was previously named Dark Merlin by General Atomics
CCA unit cost targetAbout $20 million at full-rate production
MMA target100 aircraft in 2029, 500 by 2032, at roughly $10 million each
MMA predecessorMQ-9A Reaper; 135 remained in USAF inventory as of May 2026
Test unitExperimental Operations Unit, testing at Edwards AFB (April) and Creech AFB (July)

From 150 to 500 in three months

The arithmetic is worth laying out, because the Air Force’s stated CCA fleet size has moved more than once.

In 2023, then-Secretary Frank Kendall talked about acquiring at least 1,000 CCAs across the life of the programme. That figure was subsequently walked back to a first tranche of between 100 and 150. In June 2026, announcing the production contracts for both types, Meink referred to “over 150 combat capable CCA by the end of the decade”. On Monday the same official put the 2032 number at 500.

“We will have autonomous fighters like the Collaborative Combat Aircraft, or CCA. We intend to have at least 500 of these in service by 2032. Our intent is to field 100 MMAs in 2029 at even a lower cost than the CCAs and a fraction of the cost of manned aircraft we build today. Then by 2032, 500 of these platforms will join our force.”
Troy Meink — Secretary of the Air Force, keynote address, 14 September 2026

Part of the jump is almost certainly accounting rather than ambition. The FQ-42 and FQ-44 belong to Increment 1. At least one further increment is planned, and Lockheed Martin’s Vectis and Northrop Grumman’s YFQ-48A are both circling it. The 500 figure very likely folds Increment 2 in. Meink did not say.

A Collaborative Combat Aircraft in a shelter with personnel alongside
The Air Force wants at least 500 of these in service within six years. It has so far flown two prototypes. Photo: US Air Force / Senior Airman Renee Blundon

Dark Merlin is dead, long live Vengeance

Naming matters more than it looks. A company name is marketing; an official popular name is doctrine, and it is what ends up stencilled on the airframe and written into the tactics manuals.

General Atomics had been calling its YFQ-42A Dunkler Merlin. The Air Force has now designated it Vengeance. Anduril’s Wut survives unchanged, which is a small victory for a company that was the outsider in this competition eighteen months ago and is now one of two production suppliers.

Both are Increment 1 aircraft, ordered into production in June. Meink said the first examples of each are already coming off the line, and described their intended job in unusually flat terms.

“Today, the first FQ-42 and FQ-44 increments are already rolling off the assembly line. They’ll be performing many of the same missions that we do with manned fighters today.”
Troy Meink — Secretary of the Air Force, on the state of CCA production

That is not a hedge. Anduril disclosed separately on Monday that a YFQ-44A has already flown in formation with F-35s during July testing at Creech Air Force Base, and fired an inert AIM-120 AMRAAM at a simulated target using a track handed to it over the horizon.

The quiet admission about money

The most revealing line of the day came in the question-and-answer session, not the speech. Asked about the 500 figure, Meink said the programme could go further, and then explained why that is not entirely good news.

“We talk about 500 by 2032, but we could actually build more of them than that. So now we’re in a situation where we could actually build more than we can actually afford to buy.”
Troy Meink — Secretary of the Air Force, question-and-answer session after his keynote

That is the whole CCA thesis stated backwards. The programme was designed from the start around simple aircraft that could be built quickly and cheaply, at a target of roughly $20 million each once full-rate production begins. It has worked well enough that production capacity is no longer the binding constraint. The budget is.

A row of General Atomics YFQ-42A prototypes
YFQ-42A prototypes at General Atomics. The type is now officially the FQ-42 Vengeance. Photo: GA-ASI

The second fleet nobody was expecting

Running alongside the CCA programme is a separate and much cheaper effort: Massed Modular Aircraft, or MMA, which replaces the MQ-9A Reaper rather than flying alongside fighters. Meink committed to 100 of them in 2029 and 500 by 2032, at roughly $10 million apiece. The previously stated target was at least 180.

The reason for that increase is not subtle. The Air Force had 135 MQ-9s left in inventory as of May 2026, with further losses reported since, against heavy attrition during operations over Iran and Yemen. Meink named the campaign explicitly and said ISR and strike platforms had been essential to it.

Add the two programmes together and the Air Force is describing 1,000 combat drones in service within six years, of two entirely different philosophies, at a combined airframe cost in the region of $15 billion before sensors.

The part that is still unsolved

Fleet numbers are the easy part of an announcement. How these aircraft are launched, recovered, rearmed, maintained and actually commanded in a fight is not settled, which is why the Air Force stood up a dedicated Experimental Operations Unit and has been running it hard: contested-operations testing at Edwards in April, agile combat employment trials at Creech in July.

“Collaborative Combat Aircraft change how we project power and generate mass in highly contested environments. Delivering this capability to our warfighters faster ensures our forces maintain the tactical edge required to deter and, if necessary, defeat any adversary.”
Gen. Ken Wilsbach — Air Force Chief of Staff, statement issued when the FQ-42 and FQ-44 production contracts were announced

Meink put it less formally. Getting the aircraft into operational units early matters, he said, because familiarity breeds confidence.

That is the real test. A fleet of 500 autonomous fighters is a procurement target. A squadron that trusts them is an air force.

Häufig gestellte Fragen

What are the FQ-42 Vengeance and FQ-44 Fury?
They are the first two US Air Force Collaborative Combat Aircraft, uncrewed fighters designed to fly alongside crewed jets. The FQ-42 is built by General Atomics, the FQ-44 by Anduril. Both were ordered into production in June 2026 under Increment 1 of the programme, and their official popular names were announced on 14 September 2026.
Why was the FQ-42 renamed from Dark Merlin?
Dark Merlin was General Atomics’ own company name for the design. Vengeance is the official US Air Force popular name, announced by Secretary of the Air Force Troy Meink. Anduril’s FQ-44 keeps the name Fury, which it already carried, so the naming announcement was only a change for the General Atomics aircraft.
How many Collaborative Combat Aircraft does the US Air Force want?
At least 500 in service by 2032. That is a substantial increase on the “over 150 combat capable CCA by the end of the decade” that Meink himself cited in June 2026, and it is likely to fold in a planned Increment 2 alongside the FQ-42 and FQ-44.
Was kostet ein Collaborative Combat Aircraft?
The Air Force has said it is targeting roughly $20 million per air vehicle once full-rate production begins, excluding sensors. Meink indicated that production capacity is no longer the constraint, telling the conference: “we could actually build more than we can actually afford to buy.”
What is the Massed Modular Aircraft programme?
MMA is a separate and cheaper effort to replace the MQ-9A Reaper rather than to fly alongside fighters. The Air Force wants 100 in 2029 and 500 by 2032 at roughly $10 million each, up from a previously stated target of at least 180, driven by heavy Reaper losses over Iran and Yemen.
Have the fighter drones flown with crewed aircraft yet?
Yes. A YFQ-44A Fury assigned to the Collaborative Combat Aircraft Experimental Operations Unit flew during an Agile Combat Employment exercise at Creech Air Force Base, Nevada, in July 2026, and Anduril disclosed on 14 September 2026 that it has flown in formation with F-35s. The same unit supported an earlier test exercise at Edwards Air Force Base in April 2026.

Sources: TWZ, Air & Space Forces Magazine, Defense News, US Air Force.

Ähnliche Beiträge

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *