$178 Million to Keep a 1965 Engine Alive

by | May 8, 2026 | Military Aviation, News | 0 comments

The General Electric J85 first ran on a test stand in 1956. Eisenhower was president. The Soviets had not yet launched Sputnik. Sixty-five years later, the same engine — virtually unchanged in its core architecture — is being kept alive by a fresh $178 million Air Force contract that will run through 2030.

It is, by some distance, the longest continuous production run of any military jet engine in history. And the Pentagon’s reason for keeping it going is simple: the aircraft that depend on it are not retiring any time soon, and nobody wants to pay to redesign them.

Quick Facts

Engine: General Electric J85 (variants J85-GE-5, -13, -21)

First run: 1956

Thrust class: 2,950 lbf dry / 5,000 lbf with afterburner

Aircraft using J85: T-38 Talon, F-5 Tiger II, A-37 Dragonfly, RQ-4 Global Hawk (variants)

Active fleets: ~500 USAF T-38s + 200+ F-5s in 25 export air forces

New contract: $178 million awarded April 2026 — runs through 2030

Estimated retirement: Not before 2035 (T-7A replacement schedule)

T-38 Talon supersonic trainer
The T-38 Talon — flown by every USAF pilot since 1961 — runs on two J85s. Photo: USAF / Wikimedia Commons

The Engine That Wouldn’t Die

The J85’s design brief was simple: build the smallest possible afterburning turbojet that could power a target drone. GE delivered, the engine worked, and within five years it had been adopted for crewed aircraft — first the Northrop T-38 Talon trainer, then the F-5 Freedom Fighter, then the A-37 Dragonfly attack jet of Vietnam fame.

What makes the J85 special is not its raw performance — many modern engines outperform it on every metric — but its sheer reliability and ease of maintenance. A J85 can be removed from a T-38 by two ground crew with hand tools in under three hours. Modern turbofans typically require a full hangar and overhead crane.

Why the Pentagon Keeps Buying It

The T-38 Talon is supposed to be replaced by the new Boeing T-7A Red Hawk, which uses a modern GE F404 derivative. But the T-7A’s production schedule has slipped repeatedly, and the existing 500-aircraft T-38 fleet has to keep flying training sorties at the same rate while the changeover happens. That means continued spares, continued depot overhauls, and continued new-build engines — at $178 million across the next four years.

F-5 Tiger fighter
F-5 Tigers from 25 nations still rely on J85 production lines. The export market alone justifies the contract. Photo: USAF / Wikimedia Commons

The Export Math

Even if the USAF retired its J85 fleet tomorrow, GE would have a queue of customers asking for engines. Twenty-five air forces still operate F-5 Tigers — Switzerland, Iran (yes, still flying its 1970s Tigers), Brazil, Singapore, Mexico, Turkey, and the United States itself, which uses Tigers as Navy aggressor aircraft. Every one of them needs new J85s on a rolling cycle.

That makes the J85 the rare case where a 70-year-old design is more profitable to GE than some of its modern engines, simply because the development costs were paid off in the Kennedy administration. Every new engine is essentially pure margin.

A 2030s Retirement, Maybe

The realistic retirement window for the J85 is somewhere in the late 2030s, when the T-7A finally reaches full operational tempo and the last F-5 squadrons either get European or American replacement aircraft. Until then, the engine that started its career powering target drones for Eisenhower will keep going — quietly, reliably, and at a price the Pentagon cannot find a reason to refuse.

Sources: Defence Blog, US Air Force contract announcement, GE Aviation press release.

Related Posts

Why Rheinmetall is Crashing While Europe Rearms

Why Rheinmetall is Crashing While Europe Rearms

Rheinmetall's stock peaked at €1,930 in March 2025. It is trading today at €1,180 — a 39 percent fall in fourteen months. BAE Systems is down 22 percent over the same period. Saab is down 18 percent. Leonardo is down 14 percent. Thales is flat. This is happening while...

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

en_USEnglish