For a week, the story was almost cute. Russia rolls out a two-seat Su-57. Western analysts squint at the grainy photos, nod knowingly, and file it under trainer variant — probably for export to India. The kind of footnote that gets one tweet and dies.
Then on 25 May 2026, Russian state news agency TASS dropped the other shoe. The man in the back of that second Su-57 isn’t there to learn how to fly. He’s there to run a war.
According to Sergey Bogdan, chief test pilot at the Sukhoi Design Bureau and the first man to fly the new Su-57D, the twin-seat Felon was never about training. It was always about turning a stealth fighter into a flying command post — a quiet, low-observable airborne quarterback wired into a swarm of loyal-wingman drones. That changes the conversation. That changes the war.

First flight: 19 May 2026
TASS clarification: 25 May 2026
Chief test pilot: Sergey Bogdan (Sukhoi Design Bureau)
Primary role: Manned-unmanned teaming command platform
Drones it will direct: S-70 Okhotnik-B, Grom (and likely future UCAVs)
Western parallels: F-35 + MQ-20 Avenger (USA), J-20S + GJ-21 (China)
The week Russia changed its mind
The May 19 maiden flight was always going to be picked apart. Photos showed a second canopy bulge behind the first, the tell-tale silhouette of a tandem cockpit. The first wave of analysis — we covered it here last week — assumed Moscow was finally bowing to export pressure. India had asked for a two-seater. China already had one. The math was obvious.
What TASS did six days later was quietly demolish that reading. Bogdan went on the record. The aircraft, he said, isn’t a conversion trainer with a flight instructor in the back. It’s a combat platform with a commander in the back. The distinction matters. A trainer is a school. A commander is a node.
And the role he described — supervising a unified information and control space across manned and unmanned aircraft — is exactly the slot Western air forces have been carving out for the last decade. The US calls it Manned-Unmanned Teaming. China calls it Loyal Wingman. Russia, late but stubborn, has now named its piece.
A bird’s-eye view, and a man in the seat

Bogdan’s argument is, in essence, an argument against the future being fully autonomous. The Russians believe — or at least say they believe — that drones still need a human conductor. And they want him in the air, not in a trailer in Moscow.
The reasoning is partly cultural, partly tactical. If the radio link to a ground command post is jammed, the man in the back of the Su-57D is still inside the formation. He sees what the lead pilot sees. He can re-task the Okhotnik drones in real time, peel off a flight to attack a pop-up SAM, vector a wingman onto a contact — all while the front-seat pilot keeps his head in the fight.
What this means for the next ten years
The geopolitical read is the one nobody on either side of the Atlantic wanted to write. Russia, dismissed for two years as a 20th-century air force with 21st-century paint, has just stood up — on paper at least — in the same doctrinal arena as the United States and China. The triangle of manned-unmanned teaming powers is now closed.
Whether Russian industry can actually deliver the data links, the autonomy, and the production rates that this concept demands is another question entirely. The Okhotnik program has been bleeding airframes for years. The S-70 lost over Ukraine in October 2024 is still a sore spot in Moscow. Concepts are cheap. Networks are not.
But the announcement matters because doctrine creates demand. India, which still owes Russia a procurement decision on the Su-57E, now has a story to take home: this isn’t yesterday’s fighter with a back-seat tutor. It’s tomorrow’s combat node, with a man who can run a flight of drones over the Himalayas. Whether anyone buys that pitch — or buys the drones — we’ll know within eighteen months.
Sources: TASS (25 May 2026), Aviation Week, Janes, The Aviationist, Army Recognition, Military Watch Magazine




0 Comments