850 Tomahawks in 30 Days — and the Factory Builds 90 a Year

by | Apr 13, 2026 | News | 0 comments

The number is 850. That’s how many Tomahawk cruise missiles the United States has fired at Iran in roughly thirty days of war. Each one costs about $2 million. Each one is irreplaceable in the short term. And the Pentagon is running out. The U.S. military entered Operation Epic Fury with an estimated 3,100 Tomahawks in its inventory. One month in, a quarter of the entire stockpile is gone. Officials at U.S. Central Command have begun using a word that sends chills through any operations officer: “Winchester.” In military slang, it means you’re out of ammunition. This is not a theoretical problem for some future conflict. It is happening now.
Quick Facts
Tomahawks fired: ~850 in 30 days of Operation Epic Fury
Pre-war inventory: ~3,100 missiles
Current production rate: ~90 per year (Navy requested only 57 for FY2026)
Planned surge rate: Raytheon targeting 1,000/year under new framework
Cost per missile: ~$2 million
Total cost fired: ~$1.7 billion in Tomahawks alone

The Math That Keeps Generals Awake

Here’s the problem in one sentence: America fires Tomahawks at a rate of roughly 28 per day but builds them at a rate of roughly one every four days. The annual procurement rate before the war was about 90 missiles. The Navy’s FY2026 budget request asked for just 57. Nobody anticipated burning through a quarter of the national stockpile in a single month against a single adversary. One Pentagon official told the Washington Post that the number of Tomahawks remaining in the CENTCOM theatre was “alarmingly low.” Another said the military was approaching Winchester for its regional supply. The implication is stark: if the war escalates or a second crisis erupts — say, in the Taiwan Strait — the cupboard may be bare.
Tomahawk cruise missile in flight
A Tomahawk Block IV cruise missile in flight. The U.S. has fired roughly 850 of them in one month. US Navy / Wikimedia Commons

Raytheon Scrambles to Scale

RTX — the parent company of Raytheon, which manufactures the Tomahawk — recently announced a framework agreement with the Defense Department to surge production to 1,000 missiles per year. But ramping up a precision weapons production line is not like turning up a dial. It takes time to source components, train workers, and qualify new suppliers. Even at 1,000 per year, it would take nearly a year to replace what has been fired in a month. And that assumes every missile goes to replenishment rather than being consumed by ongoing operations. The Tomahawk has been in service since 1983. It has been modernised repeatedly — the current Block V variant can hit moving ships and be retargeted in flight — but the fundamental constraint is industrial capacity. The defense industrial base was sized for peacetime procurement, not wartime consumption.

What Happens If They Run Out

The Tomahawk is not just a weapon. It is a planning assumption. Every air tasking order, every strike package, every escalation option in the CENTCOM commander’s playbook assumes Tomahawks are available in quantity. They are the opening move in any major strike — launched from ships and submarines hundreds of miles from the target, suppressing air defences before manned aircraft enter the fight. Without them, the Air Force and Navy would need to put more pilots over defended airspace, accept higher risk, or reduce the tempo of strikes. None of those options is attractive when the adversary has ballistic missiles, anti-ship cruise missiles, and an air defence network that has already downed American aircraft.
Tomahawk launch from USS Shiloh
A Tomahawk launches from the guided-missile cruiser USS Shiloh. Each missile costs roughly $2 million — and the production line cannot keep up with wartime demand. US Navy / Wikimedia Commons
The Iran war is proving what analysts have warned about for years: the United States has a munitions problem. The stockpiles were built for deterrence and for short, sharp interventions. They were not built for a sustained campaign against a peer-level air defence network. Thirty days in, the bill is coming due. Sources: Washington Post, CBS News, The War Zone, Military Times, 19FortyFive

Related Posts

Red Over White, You’re Alright: How PAPI Works

Red Over White, You’re Alright: How PAPI Works

There is a sentence every student pilot in the world learns by heart, usually while sweating through their first night approach: red over white, you're alright. Say it out loud a few times. It rhymes, which is useful, because you are about to stake a 30-ton aircraft...

F/A-XX: The Navy’s Secret Sixth-Gen Fighter Moves

F/A-XX: The Navy’s Secret Sixth-Gen Fighter Moves

Everybody talks about the F-47. Every defence reporter, every think-tank panel, every congressional hearing. Boeing's clean-sheet sixth-generation fighter for the Air Force gets the headlines and the money and the Trump tweets. Meanwhile, across the river at Naval Air...

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

en_USEnglish