בחרו עמוד

F-4 Phantom II Combat Record — Kills, Losses & Kill Ratio

Combat record

F-4 Phantom II — Combat Record

3rd-generation jet · United States · First flight 1958 · Combat-proven: air-to-air

F-4 Phantom II

Photo: U.S. Air Force / Wikimedia Commons (Public domain)
150Confirmed air-to-air kills
42Air-to-air losses
≈3.6 : 1Kill ratio
1958First flight

The story behind the numbers

Brute force made iconic: the Phantom was the free world’s fighter for two decades, and its 150-odd victories span Vietnam, the Middle East and the Indo-Pakistani wars. Over North Vietnam it learned the hard way that missiles missed and gunless fighters got embarrassed by MiG-17s — lessons that produced Topgun, the gun pod, and eventually the internal cannon of the F-4E.

Israeli Phantoms fought the hardest air war of the type’s life against Egyptian and Syrian MiG-21s; Iranian F-4s later fought Iraq for eight years. All five American aces of Vietnam — two pilots, three back-seaters — scored on Phantoms. Its 150:42 ledger, honestly counted with its early stumbles, is the record of the aircraft that defined an era.

F-4 crews destroyed 150.5 MiGs over Vietnam — the highest air-to-air tally of any Western fighter of its generation.

Campaign by campaign

Years Campaign Operator Victories A2A losses What happened
1965–73 Vietnam War אַרצוֹת הַבְּרִית 150 42 150.5 MiG kills for 42 Phantoms lost in air combat; ~719 lost to all causes, mostly ground fire.
1969–82 Arab–Israeli wars Israel 116 0 Israeli F-4E ‘Kurnass’ scored 116.5 aerial victories; most losses were to SAMs, not aircraft.
1980–88 Iran–Iraq War Iran 0 0 Iranian Phantoms claimed dozens more kills; totals disputed and excluded from the headline.
How we count. Victories are credits recognised by the operating air force, cross-checked against opposing loss records where they exist. Where wartime credits and postwar research genuinely disagree we show the range, not a single number. Friendly-fire and accident losses are not counted as air-to-air losses. Full methodology on the statistics hub.

Go deeper